Google Pixel 6a vs ZTE Blade V41 Vita: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chip provides a significantly smoother and more responsive experience, coupled with Google’s exceptional camera processing. While the ZTE Blade V41 Vita offers a compelling price, the performance gap is substantial.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Blade V41 Vita | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - V1 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - V1 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 7, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA - V2 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 23 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | 8140N | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
ZTE Blade V41 Vita
- Superior performance with Google Tensor chip
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Higher price point
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Google Pixel 6a
- Significantly more affordable
- Decent battery life (94h endurance)
- Faster charging wattage (22.5W)
- Noticeably slower performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Limited software update support
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 876 nits measured, compared to the ZTE Blade V41 Vita’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize OLED panels (based on the Pixel 6a’s 'infinite' contrast ratio), the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and Google’s color calibration will deliver a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The lack of detailed display specs for the ZTE Blade V41 Vita suggests a more basic panel.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system is a clear winner, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 6a’s image processing is renowned for its dynamic range, detail, and accurate colors. The ZTE Blade V41 Vita likely features a more standard camera setup, prioritizing quantity of lenses over quality. The absence of OIS on the ZTE Blade V41 Vita will also result in less stable videos and potentially blurrier low-light photos. The Pixel 6a’s Tensor chip also accelerates camera processing, resulting in faster capture times and improved image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Tensor (5nm) is a flagship-class processor featuring a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.80 GHz, designed for demanding tasks. The ZTE Blade V41 Vita’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) uses a Cortex-A76 prime core at 2.4 GHz. While the 6nm process is more efficient, the Tensor’s architectural advantages and higher clock speeds provide a substantial performance lead. This is particularly noticeable in tasks like photo editing, gaming, and app loading. The Pixel 6a’s Tensor also benefits from Google’s dedicated AI processing capabilities.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the ZTE Blade V41 Vita’s lower charging speed (22.5W vs 18W with PD3.0 on the Pixel 6a). The Pixel 6a’s more efficient Tensor chip likely offsets the slightly slower charging. The Pixel 6a’s PD3.0 support also allows for faster charging with compatible chargers, while the ZTE Blade V41 Vita is limited to its 22.5W standard.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V41 Vita if you prioritize affordability above all else and need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value a premium user experience, excellent camera capabilities, and long-term software support, even if it means spending more upfront.