Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The ZTE Blade V40s offers a budget-friendly option, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 is a well-regarded mid-range contender. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner. While the ZTE Blade V40s provides decent value, the A54’s superior chipset, display, camera, and longer software support make it a more compelling and future-proof choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 04 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 04 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.8 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc UMS512T T618 (12 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V40s
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Sufficient for basic tasks
- Underpowered chipset
- Lower display quality
- Less impressive camera
- Limited software support
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent performance
- Vibrant and bright display
- Great camera system
- Long software support
- Premium build quality
- Higher price
- Charging speed could be faster (25W)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display (980 nits vs. likely lower on the V40s) and an 'infinite' contrast ratio, offering a more immersive and visually appealing experience. The A54's display is also likely to have better color accuracy and viewing angles. The V40s display is adequate but lacks the premium feel of the A54.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54’s camera system is expected to be superior in both photo and video quality. Samsung's image processing is generally well-regarded, and the A54 likely offers more advanced features and better low-light performance. The V40s camera is adequate for casual snapshots but won't compete with the A54.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is a substantial upgrade over the Unisoc T618 in the Blade V40s. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A54. The V40s is sufficient for basic tasks but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the Galaxy A54 demonstrating exceptional endurance (119h endurance rating). While the V40s also has good battery life, the A54’s optimization and larger battery capacity likely give it an edge in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40s is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize affordability over premium features. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded smartphone with a great camera, vibrant display, and extended software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the ZTE Blade V40s a good phone for gaming?
The ZTE Blade V40s is not ideal for demanding games due to its underpowered chipset. It can handle basic games, but expect lower frame rates and potential lag.
❓ How long will Samsung support the Galaxy A54 with software updates?
Samsung typically provides 4 years of major Android updates and 5 years of security patches for its A-series phones, ensuring the Galaxy A54 remains secure and up-to-date for an extended period.
