The ZTE Blade series consistently offers affordable smartphones, and the V40 and V40 Design are no exception. But with subtle differences in their internal components, choosing between them can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Blade V40 with the Dimensity 700 chipset offers significantly better performance and a smoother user experience compared to the V40 Design's Unisoc Tiger T616. While both offer 22.5W charging, the V40's superior processing power makes it the clear winner for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2022, December 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January | Available. Released 2023, January 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 163 x 74 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 183.4 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, MyOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Sky Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | - | 8046 |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
ZTE Blade V40
- Significantly better performance
- Faster app loading
- Smoother multitasking
- Better image processing
- Potentially slightly higher price
- May have slightly less RAM in some configurations
ZTE Blade V40 Design
- More affordable
- Decent battery life
- Sufficient for basic tasks
- Slow performance
- Laggy user experience
- Subpar image processing
- Limited gaming capabilities
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature a similar 6.67-inch display with a 1080 x 2400 resolution. Expect vibrant colors and decent viewing angles, though neither is expected to have advanced display technologies like OLED. The V40 might have slightly better color accuracy due to its more powerful chipset's image processing capabilities.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a 48MP main camera, but the V40's more powerful chipset will likely result in better image processing, leading to slightly better photos, especially in low light. Expect similar ultrawide and macro lens capabilities on both.
Performance
This is where the biggest difference lies. The Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the V40 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Unisoc Tiger T616 in the V40 Design. Expect smoother app loading, faster multitasking, and better gaming performance on the V40. The V40 Design will feel noticeably slower, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate usage. The 22.5W wired charging is consistent across both models, allowing for relatively quick charging times.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and a responsive experience, even on a budget. It's great for light gaming and multitasking. The ZTE Blade V40 Design is a better choice for users who primarily need a phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light browsing, and are extremely budget-conscious.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the ZTE Blade V40 Design good for gaming?
The V40 Design's chipset is not ideal for gaming. You'll likely experience lag and low frame rates, even with less demanding games.
❓ Which ZTE Blade V40 has better camera quality?
The ZTE Blade V40 generally offers better camera quality due to its more powerful chipset's image processing capabilities.
❓ Are the displays on both phones the same?
Both phones likely have similar 6.67-inch displays with a 1080 x 2400 resolution, but the V40 might have slightly better color accuracy.
