The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the budget-friendly ZTE Blade V40 and the popular Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G emerges as the overall winner thanks to its superior display, more powerful chipset, and better camera capabilities. While the ZTE Blade V40 offers good value, the A53's premium features and brand recognition make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | - | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | - | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9)
GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V40
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Good value for money
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display quality
- Less impressive camera
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Excellent display
- Powerful chipset
- Versatile camera system
- Reputable brand
- Higher price
- Slower charging (compared to some competitors)
- Plastic build
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display (830 nits vs. likely around 400-500 nits for the Blade V40) and an 'infinite' contrast ratio, offering richer colors and deeper blacks. The A53's display is also likely to have better color accuracy and viewing angles. The Blade V40's display is adequate but doesn't match the A53's quality.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A53 5G generally offers a more versatile and higher-quality camera system. While specific megapixel counts might be similar, Samsung's image processing and features are typically superior. Expect better low-light performance, more detail, and more consistent results from the A53's camera.
Performance
The Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the Blade V40. The A53's Cortex-A78 cores provide a significant boost in performance for demanding tasks and gaming. While the Blade V40 is capable for everyday use, the A53 offers a smoother and more responsive experience.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with an endurance rating of 113h. However, the A53's more efficient chipset might give it a slight edge in real-world usage, especially with demanding tasks. Charging speeds are comparable, both at 25W.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40 is ideal for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize affordability and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is perfect for users seeking a well-rounded experience with a great display, capable camera, and reliable performance, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G's Exynos 1280 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the ZTE Blade V40's Dimensity 700.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G worth the extra money?
Yes, if you prioritize a better display, faster performance, and a more capable camera, the Galaxy A53 5G is worth the investment. However, if you're on a tight budget, the Blade V40 offers a decent experience for the price.
