Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The ZTE Blade V40 and Samsung Galaxy A34 both offer compelling features at different price points. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which device best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 emerges as the clear winner, offering a superior display, more powerful chipset, and a more polished software experience. While the ZTE Blade V40 provides decent value, the A34's overall performance and features justify its higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | - | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | - | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V40
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Good value for money
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display quality
- Basic camera features
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Vibrant Super AMOLED display
- Powerful Dimensity 1080 chipset
- Excellent battery life
- Reputable brand
- Higher price
- Charging speed could be faster
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 boasts a significantly brighter display (1009 nits) with an impressive contrast ratio (Infinite), providing vivid colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Blade V40's display is adequate but lacks the same level of vibrancy and brightness. The A34's Super AMOLED technology further enhances the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the Galaxy A34 is expected to deliver superior image quality thanks to Samsung's image processing and potentially better hardware. The A34 likely features a more versatile camera system with features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The Blade V40's camera is adequate for casual photography.
Performance
The Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset (6nm) offers a noticeable performance boost over the Blade V40's Dimensity 700 (7nm). This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The A34's Cortex-A78 cores provide a significant advantage in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an endurance rating of 133h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, Samsung's software optimization often leads to more efficient power management, potentially giving the A34 a slight edge in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40 is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better choice for those seeking a premium experience with a vibrant display, strong performance, and a reliable camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A34, with its Dimensity 1080 chipset, offers significantly better gaming performance than the ZTE Blade V40.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A34 worth the extra cost?
Yes, if you prioritize a better display, faster performance, and a more reliable camera system, the Samsung Galaxy A34 is worth the extra investment.