ZTE Blade V40 vs Samsung Galaxy A34: A Detailed Comparison

Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The ZTE Blade V40 and Samsung Galaxy A34 both offer compelling features at different price points. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which device best suits your needs and budget.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A34 emerges as the clear winner, offering a superior display, more powerful chipset, and a more polished software experience. While the ZTE Blade V40 provides decent value, the A34's overall performance and features justify its higher price.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Blade V40 Samsung Galaxy A34
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2022, February 282023, March 14
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, JanuaryAvailable. Released 2023, March 24
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions-161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight-199 g (7.02 oz)
 -IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm26.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G68 MC4
OSAndroid 12Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)-
Triple48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
BluetoothYes5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANYesWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging22.5W wired25W wired
TypeLi-Po 6000 mAhLi-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, BlueLime, Graphite, Violet, Silver
Models-SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460
Price-€ 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999
SAR EU-0.55 W/kg (head)     1.49 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 133h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.1 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 472126 (v9) GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Blade V40

  • Affordable
  • Decent battery life
  • Good value for money

  • Less powerful chipset
  • Lower display quality
  • Basic camera features

Samsung Galaxy A34

  • Vibrant Super AMOLED display
  • Powerful Dimensity 1080 chipset
  • Excellent battery life
  • Reputable brand

  • Higher price
  • Charging speed could be faster

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A34 boasts a significantly brighter display (1009 nits) with an impressive contrast ratio (Infinite), providing vivid colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Blade V40's display is adequate but lacks the same level of vibrancy and brightness. The A34's Super AMOLED technology further enhances the viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the Galaxy A34 is expected to deliver superior image quality thanks to Samsung's image processing and potentially better hardware. The A34 likely features a more versatile camera system with features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The Blade V40's camera is adequate for casual photography.

Performance

The Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset (6nm) offers a noticeable performance boost over the Blade V40's Dimensity 700 (7nm). This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The A34's Cortex-A78 cores provide a significant advantage in demanding tasks.

Battery Life

Both phones boast an endurance rating of 133h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, Samsung's software optimization often leads to more efficient power management, potentially giving the A34 a slight edge in real-world usage.

Buying Guide

The ZTE Blade V40 is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better choice for those seeking a premium experience with a vibrant display, strong performance, and a reliable camera system.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A34, with its Dimensity 1080 chipset, offers significantly better gaming performance than the ZTE Blade V40.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A34 worth the extra cost?
Yes, if you prioritize a better display, faster performance, and a more reliable camera system, the Samsung Galaxy A34 is worth the extra investment.