The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the ZTE Blade V40 and Samsung Galaxy A23 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key aspects to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A23 edges out the ZTE Blade V40 thanks to its superior display, longer software support, and generally more polished Samsung experience. While the Blade V40 offers a decent chipset, the A23's overall package provides better value for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2022, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January | Available. Released 2022, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A235F, SM-A235F/DS, SM-A235F/DSN, SM-A235M, SM-A235M/DS, SM-A235N |
| Price | - | £ 99.00 / ₹ 14,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.48 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1241:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 273554 (v9)
GeekBench: 1632 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V40
- Slightly faster chipset
- Competitive price
- Decent battery life
- Less established brand
- Potentially lower display quality
- Uncertain camera performance
- Slower charging
Samsung Galaxy A23
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Better camera system (expected)
- Samsung's software support and ecosystem
- Reliable performance
- Slightly faster charging
- Slightly slower chipset than V40
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A23 boasts a brighter display (464 nits vs unknown for V40) and a generally more vibrant color reproduction. While both have a 1241:1 contrast ratio, Samsung's display technology typically delivers a more visually appealing experience. The A23 likely has a higher resolution as well, contributing to sharper visuals.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are marketed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Samsung Galaxy A23 is expected to have a more versatile and higher-quality camera system. Samsung's image processing is generally considered superior, and the A23 likely includes more advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The ZTE Blade V40's Mediatek Dimensity 700 offers a slight edge in raw processing power compared to the Snapdragon 680. However, the Snapdragon 680 is known for its efficiency and optimized performance within the Samsung ecosystem. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones claim an endurance rating of 130 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, Samsung's software optimization often leads to better real-world battery performance. The A23's 25W charging is slightly faster than the V40's 22.5W.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40 is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly faster chipset for basic gaming and everyday tasks, and who are comfortable with a less established brand. The Samsung Galaxy A23 is ideal for those seeking a reliable, well-supported device with a vibrant display, a capable camera, and the peace of mind of a Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A23 will receive longer software updates and security patches compared to the ZTE Blade V40, thanks to Samsung's commitment to long-term support.
❓ Is the ZTE Blade V40 good for gaming?
The ZTE Blade V40's Dimensity 700 chipset can handle basic games, but demanding titles may require lower graphics settings. The Galaxy A23's Snapdragon 680 is also suitable for casual gaming.
