The ZTE Blade V40 series offers compelling budget-friendly options. But with two distinct models – the Vita and the Design – choosing the right one can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs and features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Blade V40 Design edges out the Vita thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and CPU. While both offer solid value, the Design's improved performance makes it the preferable choice for smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading, especially for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 31 | 2022, December 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2023, January 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) | 163 x 74 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214.3 g (7.55 oz) | 183.4 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, MyOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Sky Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | 8045 | 8046 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 200 EUR |
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
- Affordable price
- Large 5000mAh battery
- Decent 50MP main camera
- Good display for the price
- Less powerful chipset than Design
- Performance can be sluggish with demanding apps
- Average low-light camera performance
ZTE Blade V40 Design
- Slightly better performance than Vita
- Good value for money
- Large 5000mAh battery
- Decent 50MP main camera
- Still a budget phone, so don't expect flagship performance
- Average low-light camera performance
- Design might be subjective
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 6.67-inch IPS LCD displays with a 1080 x 2400 resolution. Expect vibrant colors and decent viewing angles, though brightness might be average. The Design might have a slightly more refined design, given its name, but both are expected to be largely comparable in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to feature a 50MP main camera, along with ultrawide and macro lenses. Image quality will likely be similar, with decent results in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance might be a weak point for both due to the budget nature of the devices. The Design might have slightly better image processing due to its chipset.
Performance
Here's where the Design pulls ahead. The Unisoc Tiger T616 boasts a higher clocked CPU (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 vs 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 in the Vita) and slightly improved overall performance. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The Vita will still be usable, but the Design offers a noticeable upgrade.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. Charging speeds are identical at 22.5W wired, allowing for relatively quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita is ideal for users prioritizing a balance of affordability and essential features. It's a good choice for basic tasks, social media, and casual photography. The ZTE Blade V40 Design is better suited for users who want a bit more performance for multitasking, gaming, or running more demanding apps, without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the ZTE Blade V40 Vita and Design?
The primary difference lies in the chipset. The Design has the Unisoc Tiger T616, offering slightly better performance compared to the Vita's Unisoc T606.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The ZTE Blade V40 Design is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful chipset, although neither phone is designed for high-end gaming.
