The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the ZTE Blade V40 Vita and the Samsung Galaxy A14. Both promise a lot, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 generally edges out the ZTE Blade V40 Vita thanks to its more powerful chipset (especially the Exynos version), better software support, and generally more refined Samsung experience. While the ZTE offers faster charging, the A14's overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 31 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214.3 g (7.55 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | 8045 | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
- Faster Charging (22.5W)
- Large Display
- Competitive Price
- Weaker Processor
- Less Refined Software
- Limited Software Updates
- Lower Camera Quality
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Better Performance (Exynos Version)
- More Reliable Software Support
- Superior Camera System
- Refined Samsung Experience
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Can be slightly more expensive
- Helio G80 version performance is mid-range
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, but the Galaxy A14 typically boasts a slightly better panel with more accurate colors and potentially higher brightness. The Blade V40 Vita's display is adequate but may lack the vibrancy of the A14. Resolution is likely similar, around 1080 x 2408 pixels.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A14 generally offers a more versatile camera system with better image processing. While both phones have multiple lenses, the A14's main sensor and software optimization typically result in superior photo and video quality, especially in low light. The Blade V40 Vita's camera is acceptable but lacks the refinement of the A14.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A14, particularly the Exynos 850 version, holds a significant advantage in performance. The Helio G80 is decent, but the Exynos offers noticeably faster processing speeds and better multitasking capabilities. The Unisoc T606 in the Blade V40 Vita is adequate for basic tasks but struggles with demanding apps and games.
Battery Life
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita wins in this category with its 22.5W fast charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Galaxy A14's 15W charging is slower. Both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), so charging speed is the key differentiator here.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita is a good choice for users prioritizing fast charging and a large display on a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is ideal for those seeking a more reliable and feature-rich experience with longer software support and a generally smoother performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A14, especially the Exynos 850 version, offers significantly better gaming performance due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ How long will Samsung provide software updates for the Galaxy A14?
Samsung typically provides longer software update support for its Galaxy A series devices, generally offering 4 years of security updates and 2 years of OS upgrades.
❓ Is the ZTE Blade V40 Vita worth considering if fast charging is a priority?
Yes, if fast charging is your absolute top priority and you're on a very tight budget, the ZTE Blade V40 Vita is a viable option. However, consider the trade-offs in performance and software support.
