The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the ZTE Blade V40 Vita and the Realme C35. Both promise a solid experience without breaking the bank, but which one truly delivers? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme C35 edges out the ZTE Blade V40 Vita thanks to its slightly faster processor and more efficient charging. While both offer good value, the Realme's performance advantage makes it the preferable choice for most users seeking a reliable and affordable smartphone.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 31 | 2022, February 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, February 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214.3 g (7.55 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Glowing Black, Glowing Green |
| Models | 8045 | RMX3511 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | £ 129.99 / ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) |
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
- Large Display
- Potentially better camera (marketing)
- Decent Battery Life
- Slower Processor
- Slower Charging
- Less Responsive UI
Realme C35
- Faster Processor
- Faster Charging
- Modern Design
- Smoother Performance
- Camera may be slightly inferior
- Display may be slightly less vibrant
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large 6.6-inch displays, likely with an HD+ resolution. The ZTE Blade V40 Vita might have a slightly better panel based on anecdotal reports, but both offer adequate viewing for everyday use. Expect similar color accuracy and brightness levels.
Camera Comparison
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita is often advertised with a higher megapixel count for its main camera (typically 50MP vs Realme's 50MP), but megapixels aren't everything. Image processing and sensor size play a crucial role. Both phones offer decent camera performance in good lighting conditions, but expect limitations in low light. Video recording capabilities will be similar, likely topping out at 1080p.
Performance
Here, the Realme C35 takes a clear lead. Its Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset boasts a faster CPU clock speed (2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 vs 1.6 GHz) compared to the ZTE Blade V40 Vita's T606. This translates to snappier app loading, smoother multitasking, and a generally more responsive user experience. Gaming performance will also be better on the Realme C35.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a substantial 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the Realme C35's 18W charging support is faster than the ZTE Blade V40 Vita's 22.5W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita is a good choice for users prioritizing a large display and potentially a slightly better camera experience (though both are basic). The Realme C35 is ideal for those who want a smoother overall experience, faster charging, and a more modern design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Realme C35 is significantly better for gaming due to its faster processor.
❓ Does either phone have 5G connectivity?
No, neither the ZTE Blade V40 Vita nor the Realme C35 support 5G.
❓ What is the storage capacity of each phone?
Both typically come in 64GB or 128GB storage options, expandable via microSD card.
❓ Which phone has a better design?
The Realme C35 generally has a more modern and appealing design.
