The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the ZTE Blade V40 Vita and Motorola Moto E13 are two contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one truly delivers the best value? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita edges out the Moto E13 primarily due to its significantly faster 22.5W charging. While both share the same Unisoc T606 chipset, the Vita's charging speed provides a noticeable advantage for those needing a quick power boost. Otherwise, they are quite similar.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 31 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2023, February 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214.3 g (7.55 oz) | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green |
| Models | 8045 | - |
| Price | About 130 EUR | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 |
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
- Faster 22.5W Charging
- Potentially better camera
- Sleek design (generally)
- Competitive price
- Brand recognition less established than Motorola
- Software updates may be less frequent
Motorola Moto E13
- Clean Android experience
- Reliable brand reputation
- Good battery life
- Simple and user-friendly
- Slower 10W Charging
- Potentially less impressive camera
- Basic performance
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent visuals for everyday use. Expect similar color accuracy and brightness levels. The Moto E13 might have a slightly more refined display calibration due to Motorola's software optimization, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita is expected to have a slightly better camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing algorithms. Motorola often focuses on simplicity in their camera app, while ZTE might offer more features. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions for both.
Performance
Powered by the same Unisoc T606 chipset, performance will be largely comparable. Expect smooth navigation and basic multitasking, but demanding games and heavy applications might struggle. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization and RAM management.
Battery Life
Both phones likely house a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life under moderate usage. However, the ZTE Blade V40 Vita's 22.5W charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the Moto E13's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40 Vita is ideal for users who prioritize faster charging and potentially a slightly better camera experience (based on general expectations for ZTE). The Motorola Moto E13 is a solid choice for those seeking a reliable, clean Android experience and a more established brand reputation, even with slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Motorola generally provides more consistent and timely software updates compared to ZTE, although both are budget brands.
❓ Is the Unisoc T606 chipset good for gaming?
The Unisoc T606 is adequate for casual games, but it's not powerful enough for demanding titles or high graphics settings. Expect some lag and reduced frame rates.
