The ZTE Blade series consistently delivers affordable smartphones, and the V40 Pro and V40 Vita are no exception. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Blade V40 Pro clearly takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster chipset, 65W charging, and likely improved camera capabilities. While the V40 Vita offers a more budget-friendly price, the Pro's performance and charging speed justify the extra cost for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 01 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 08 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 214.3 g (7.55 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T618 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30ps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 50% in 15 min | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Green, Iridescent White | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | - | 8045 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 130 EUR |
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
- Faster Processor (Unisoc T618)
- 65W Fast Charging
- Likely Better Camera
- Sleek Design (typical of Blade series)
- Potentially Higher Price
- May lack NFC in some regions
ZTE Blade V40 Vita
- More Affordable
- Reliable Performance for Basic Tasks
- Decent Battery Life
- Slower Processor (Unisoc T606)
- Slow Charging (22.5W)
- Likely Inferior Camera
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely FHD+). However, the Pro might have slightly better color accuracy or brightness due to potentially higher quality components. We'll need to confirm specific display specs for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely offer a multi-camera setup, the V40 Pro is expected to have a superior camera system. This could include a higher resolution main sensor, improved image processing, and potentially additional features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The V40 Vita will likely suffice for casual photography.
Performance
The Unisoc Tiger T618 in the V40 Pro is a noticeable upgrade over the T606 in the V40 Vita. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better overall responsiveness on the Pro. The Pro's Cortex-A75 cores also run at a higher clock speed, further boosting performance.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh). However, the V40 Pro's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 50% in just 15 minutes, while the V40 Vita's 22.5W charging will take considerably longer.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V40 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance, fast charging, and a better camera experience. It's a great choice for those who want a smooth experience for everyday tasks and occasional gaming. The ZTE Blade V40 Vita is best suited for users on a tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic communication, social media, and light usage. It's a reliable option for those who don't demand high performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the ZTE Blade V40 Pro worth the extra money?
Yes, if you value performance and fast charging. The Pro offers a significantly better experience overall.
❓ Does the ZTE Blade V40 Vita have NFC?
NFC availability varies by region. Check the specifications for your specific market.
❓ What kind of storage options are available for each phone?
Both phones typically offer multiple storage configurations, usually starting at 64GB and going up to 128GB or 256GB. Expandable storage via microSD card is also common.
