The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the ZTE Blade V40 Pro, known for its rapid charging, and the Samsung Galaxy A34, lauded for its endurance and display. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 emerges as the overall winner. While the ZTE Blade V40 Pro boasts incredibly fast 65W charging, the A34's superior display, more powerful chipset, better camera capabilities, and longer software support make it a more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 01 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 08 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T618 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G52 MP2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30ps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 50% in 15 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Green, Iridescent White | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | - | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
- 65W Fast Charging
- Budget-Friendly Price
- Decent Display
- Octa-Core Processor
- Weaker Processor
- Less Capable Camera
- Shorter Software Support
- Lower Display Brightness
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Excellent Display (Brightness & Contrast)
- Powerful Chipset
- Superior Camera
- Long Battery Life
- Samsung Software Support
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Higher Price Point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its 1009 nits max brightness ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, while the 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Blade V40 Pro's display is adequate but lacks the A34's punch and outdoor visibility. The A34 also likely features a higher resolution panel.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Galaxy A34 is expected to deliver superior image quality. Samsung's camera processing is generally well-regarded, and the A34 likely features a more advanced sensor and lens setup. The Blade V40 Pro's camera is likely adequate for basic photography but won't compete with the A34's capabilities.
Performance
The Galaxy A34's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro's Unisoc Tiger T618 (12nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A34. The A34's Cortex-A78 cores offer a substantial performance boost over the Blade V40 Pro's Cortex-A75 cores.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A34's endurance rating of 133h demonstrates exceptional battery life. While the Blade V40 Pro's 65W charging is incredibly fast, it compensates for a likely smaller battery capacity and less efficient chipset. The A34 offers a better balance of battery life and charging speed.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the ZTE Blade V40 Pro? Users prioritizing extremely fast charging and a budget-friendly price point. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A34? Those seeking a reliable, long-lasting phone with a vibrant display, capable camera, and the assurance of Samsung's software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the ZTE Blade V40 Pro good for gaming?
The Blade V40 Pro's chipset is adequate for casual games, but demanding titles may experience lag or reduced frame rates. The Galaxy A34 is a better choice for gamers.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the ZTE Blade V40 Pro?
With its 65W charging, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro can likely charge from 0% to 50% in around 15 minutes, and a full charge should take approximately 45-60 minutes.
