Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone that doesn't compromise too much? The ZTE Blade V30 and Samsung Galaxy A30 are both contenders, offering a range of features at an accessible price point. But which one comes out on top? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A30 edges out the ZTE Blade V30 thanks to its superior display brightness, proven battery endurance, and the brand recognition of Samsung. While the Blade V30 offers a slightly newer chipset, the A30's overall package provides a more polished and reliable experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - Mexico | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 26, 28, 66 - Mexico | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 16 | 2019, February 25. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 01 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 77.8 x 8.9 mm (6.53 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 158.5 x 74.7 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T618 (12 nm) | Exynos 7904 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G52 MP2 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue, Red, White |
| Models | 9030 | SM-A305F, SM-A305FN, SM-A305G, SM-A305GN, SM-A305YN, SM-A3050, SM-A305N, SM-A305GT |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.32 W/kg (head) 0.40 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.25 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.3dB / Crosstalk -88.9dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 92h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 65dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 68dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 96550 (v7)
GeekBench: 4146 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 4.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V30
- Slightly newer chipset
- Potentially more modern design
- Competitive price
- Unspecified display brightness
- Unknown battery life
- Less established brand reputation
- Potentially weaker camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A30
- Brighter display (548 nits)
- Exceptional battery life (92h endurance)
- Reputable brand
- Likely better camera performance
- Older chipset
- Slower charging (15W)
- Potentially less modern design
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A30 boasts a significantly brighter display at 548 nits (measured) compared to the Blade V30's unspecified brightness. While the A30's contrast ratio is nominally infinite, the higher brightness makes a noticeable difference in outdoor visibility. The Blade V30 likely has a more modern design, but the A30's display is functionally superior.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Generally, Samsung's image processing is considered more refined. The Galaxy A30 likely offers better image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions, due to Samsung's established camera software and hardware expertise. The Blade V30 might offer newer camera features, but without specifics, it's hard to say.
Performance
The ZTE Blade V30's Unisoc Tiger T618 chipset, built on a 12nm process, is theoretically newer than the Galaxy A30's Exynos 7904 (14nm). However, real-world performance is often more complex. The A30's Cortex-A73 cores offer a performance advantage over the Blade V30's Cortex-A55 cores, potentially leading to smoother multitasking and app loading. Gaming performance will likely be similar on both devices.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A30 shines in this category, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 92 hours. This is a significant advantage over the Blade V30, which lacks a specified battery capacity or endurance rating. The A30's larger battery and efficient chipset contribute to its exceptional battery life.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V30 is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly newer chipset and potentially a more modern design. The Samsung Galaxy A30 is ideal for those who value long battery life, a brighter display, and the reliability of a well-established brand, even if it's an older model.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has significantly better battery life, with an endurance rating of 92 hours, compared to the ZTE Blade V30 which has no specified rating.
❓ Is the ZTE Blade V30's chipset faster?
While the ZTE Blade V30 has a newer chipset (Unisoc Tiger T618), the Samsung Galaxy A30's Exynos 7904 features more powerful Cortex-A73 cores, potentially resulting in better real-world performance.
