ZTE Blade V30 vs Samsung Galaxy A03s: A Detailed Comparison

Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The ZTE Blade V30 and Samsung Galaxy A03s are both contenders, offering essential features at affordable prices. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A03s edges out the ZTE Blade V30 thanks to its exceptional battery life and generally more polished Samsung experience. While the Blade V30 boasts a slightly more powerful chipset, the A03s' longevity and brand recognition make it the better overall choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Blade V30 Samsung Galaxy A03s
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - MexicoHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 26, 28, 66 - Mexico1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A037U
Launch
Announced2021, July 162021, August 18
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, September 01Available. Released 2021, August 18
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions165.8 x 77.8 x 8.9 mm (6.53 x 3.06 x 0.35 in)164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight193 g (6.81 oz)196 g (6.91 oz)
Display
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDPLS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T618 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
GPUMali G52 MP2PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 11Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 Core
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Single16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)5 MP, f/2.2
Triple64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)5 MP, f/2.2
Video-1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/acWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximityFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging18W wired15W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, BlueBlack, Blue, White
Models9030SM-A037F, SM-A037F/DS, SM-A037M, SM-A037G, SM-A037U, SM-S134DL, SM-A037W, SM-A037U1, SM-S135DL
PriceAbout 200 EUR$ 65.65 / £ 82.99 / ₹ 10,800
SAR EU-0.36 W/kg (head)     1.09 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 122h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1718:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -27.4 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 103465 (v8), 101299 (v9) GeekBench: 889 (v5.1) GFXBench: 5.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Blade V30

  • Slightly more powerful chipset
  • Potentially faster performance for basic gaming
  • 18W fast charging

  • Likely lower battery life
  • Less established brand reputation
  • Uncertain camera performance

Samsung Galaxy A03s

  • Exceptional battery life (122h endurance rating)
  • Reliable Samsung brand
  • Brighter display (488 nits)
  • User-friendly interface

  • Slightly less powerful chipset
  • 15W charging (slower than Blade V30)
  • Nominal contrast ratio specification

Display Comparison

Both phones feature similar contrast ratios (1718:1), but the Samsung Galaxy A03s has a measured peak brightness of 488 nits, which is noticeably brighter than what we'd expect from the Blade V30. This gives the A03s a slight advantage in outdoor visibility. Screen sizes are likely comparable, around 6.5 inches, with similar resolutions (likely HD+).

Camera Comparison

Camera specs are not fully detailed for either device, but both are likely to offer a primary sensor and potentially ultrawide or macro lenses. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Samsung generally has a reputation for better camera software, potentially giving the A03s an edge in image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions.

Performance

The ZTE Blade V30's Unisoc Tiger T618 chipset with Cortex-A75 cores offers a theoretical performance edge over the Galaxy A03s' Helio P35. However, real-world performance differences will likely be minimal for everyday tasks. The A03s' software optimization might compensate for the slightly weaker chipset.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A03s shines here. Its endurance rating of 122 hours is exceptional, suggesting significantly longer battery life than the ZTE Blade V30. While the Blade V30 has 18W charging, the A03s' 15W charging is less of a disadvantage given its superior battery efficiency.

Buying Guide

The ZTE Blade V30 is a good option for users prioritizing a slightly faster processor for basic gaming or multitasking. The Samsung Galaxy A03s is ideal for those who value long battery life, a reliable brand, and a user-friendly interface, even if it means sacrificing a bit of processing power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The ZTE Blade V30 has a slightly more powerful chipset, so it *might* handle basic games better. However, both phones are budget devices and won't offer a premium gaming experience.
❓ How long will the Samsung Galaxy A03s battery last?
The Galaxy A03s boasts an impressive endurance rating of 122 hours, suggesting it can easily last a day or two on a single charge with moderate usage.