Looking for a new smartphone but overwhelmed by the choices? We're pitting the budget-friendly ZTE Blade V30 Vita against the popular Samsung Galaxy A54 to see which one offers the best bang for your buck. This comparison will cover everything from display quality to camera performance and battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner. While the ZTE Blade V30 Vita offers affordability, the A54’s superior chipset, brighter display, better camera, and longer software support make it a more compelling and future-proof choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - Mexico | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 26, 28, 66 - Mexico | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 16 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 173 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm (6.81 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~288 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 137.8 cm2 (~102.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.6 GHz | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | 8030 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | - | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V30 Vita
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Sleek design (likely)
- Lower performance
- Less impressive camera
- Limited software support
- Lower display quality
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent display
- Powerful processor
- Great camera
- Long battery life
- Samsung's software support
- Water resistance (likely)
- More expensive
- Charging speed could be faster
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display (980 nits) with an 'infinite' contrast ratio, offering vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Blade V30 Vita's display is likely adequate but lacks the same level of quality and brightness. The A54's Super AMOLED technology also provides deeper blacks and richer colors.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54's camera system is expected to be significantly better, offering improved image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance. While the Blade V30 Vita's camera is functional, it won't match the A54's capabilities. The A54 likely includes features like optical image stabilization (OIS) which the V30 Vita probably lacks.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 chipset in the Galaxy A54 is a substantial upgrade over the Blade V30 Vita's Octa-core 1.6 GHz processor. The A54's faster CPU and GPU provide smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The A54's 5nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the Galaxy A54 demonstrating exceptional endurance (119h endurance rating). While the Blade V30 Vita's battery life is likely good, the A54's larger capacity and more efficient chipset give it a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V30 Vita is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize affordability above all else and don't need high-end features. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking a well-rounded mid-range phone with a great display, capable camera, and long-lasting battery, and appreciate Samsung's software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the ZTE Blade V30 Vita a good budget phone?
It's a decent option if your budget is extremely limited, but the Samsung Galaxy A54 offers significantly better value for a slightly higher price.
❓ How long will Samsung support the Galaxy A54 with software updates?
Samsung typically provides 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates for their A-series phones, ensuring a longer lifespan for the Galaxy A54.
