Both the ZTE Blade V10 Vita and Xiaomi Redmi 8A Pro occupy the ultra-budget smartphone segment, aiming to deliver essential functionality at the lowest possible price. However, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Blade V10 Vita relies on a newer, but less powerful, Unisoc chipset, while the Redmi 8A Pro opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 439. This comparison dissects these choices, revealing which phone offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi 8A Pro is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 439, despite being built on a slightly older process, delivers a more responsive experience, and the 18W charging significantly reduces downtime. The Blade V10 Vita is a viable option for extremely light users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, March | 2020, April 02. Released 2020, April 02 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.19 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 156.5 x 75.4 x 9.4 mm (6.16 x 2.97 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 150 g (5.29 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.45 GHz Cortex A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 505 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (64/3GB model only) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM Radio, built-in antenna |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Sky White, Sea Blue, Midnight Grey |
| Price | - | About 90 EUR |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
- Potentially lower price point
- Unisoc chipset represents newer architecture
- May offer slightly more compact form factor
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 439
- Slower charging speeds
- Less efficient 28nm process
Xiaomi Redmi 8A Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 439 processor
- 18W fast charging
- 2.5W reverse wired charging
- Slightly older chipset architecture
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially larger form factor
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature 720p+ resolution panels, typical for this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specs prevents a direct comparison of brightness or color accuracy. The Redmi 8A Pro’s slightly larger screen size (typically 6.22 inches vs. the Blade V10 Vita’s 6.01 inches) may offer a marginally more immersive viewing experience, but this is a minor difference. Both will likely use IPS LCD technology.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones featuring basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Redmi 8A Pro’s brand reputation suggests slightly better image processing algorithms. Both phones likely include a primary sensor and a depth sensor, with the Blade V10 Vita potentially including a third, low-resolution sensor. Image quality will be acceptable for social media sharing in good lighting conditions, but expect significant noise and lack of detail in low light.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi 8A Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (12nm) utilizes Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.95 GHz, offering a performance advantage over the ZTE Blade V10 Vita’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). While both are octa-core, the Snapdragon 439’s more efficient 12nm process and slightly faster cores translate to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The Unisoc chip’s Cortex-A55 cores, while newer architecture, are clocked lower and the 28nm process is less efficient. This means the Redmi 8A Pro will likely exhibit less thermal throttling under sustained load, making it better suited for light gaming. The Redmi 8A Pro also benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software support.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, both phones likely house around 4000-5000mAh batteries. The key differentiator is charging speed. The Redmi 8A Pro supports 18W wired charging, significantly faster than the Blade V10 Vita’s expected 10W charging. This translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time, reducing downtime. The Redmi 8A Pro also features 2.5W reverse wired charging, allowing it to act as a power bank for other devices – a feature absent on the Blade V10 Vita.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V10 Vita if you need a phone for absolutely basic tasks – calls, texts, and occasional light browsing – and prioritize a potentially lower price point. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 8A Pro if you prefer a smoother user experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of 18W fast charging, even if it means spending a little more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi 8A Pro handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 439 in the Redmi 8A Pro can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at lower graphics settings (balanced or low) to maintain a playable frame rate. The Unisoc SC9863A in the Blade V10 Vita will likely struggle with consistent performance in PUBG Mobile, even on the lowest settings.
❓ Does the Blade V10 Vita support fast charging at all?
The ZTE Blade V10 Vita is expected to support only standard 10W charging. This means a full charge will take considerably longer compared to the Redmi 8A Pro’s 18W fast charging capability.
❓ Is the reverse charging feature on the Redmi 8A Pro useful?
The 2.5W reverse charging on the Redmi 8A Pro is a niche feature, but can be helpful in emergencies to top up accessories like wireless earbuds or a smartwatch. It's not designed to quickly charge another phone.
❓ Which phone is better for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
The Xiaomi Redmi 8A Pro will provide a smoother and more responsive experience for everyday tasks due to its more powerful Snapdragon 439 chipset. App loading times and multitasking will be noticeably faster.
