The ZTE Blade V10 Vita and Samsung Galaxy A10e represent the lower end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability. However, beneath the similar price points lie significant differences in chipset architecture and performance capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy A10e is the better choice. While the ZTE Blade V10 Vita attempts to offer more cores, the Exynos 7884’s more efficient 14nm process and superior Cortex-A73 cores deliver a smoother, more responsive experience, particularly in multitasking and demanding applications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - AT&T |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 29, 30, 66 - AT&T |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Metro PCS, T-Mobile |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, March | 2019, July. Released 2019, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.19 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 147.3 x 69.6 x 8.4 mm (5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 150 g (5.29 oz) | 141 g (4.97 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.83 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Exynos 7884 (14 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/1.9, AF
or
5 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.0
or
2 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (64/3GB model only) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Black |
| Models | - | SM-A102U, SM-S102DL, SM-A102U1, SM-A102W, SM-A102N |
| Price | - | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.47 W/kg (head) 0.54 W/kg (body) |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
- Potentially lower price point
- Octa-core processor (though less performant)
- May offer slightly more RAM depending on configuration
- Less efficient chipset (28nm)
- Inferior CPU architecture (Cortex-A55 only)
- Likely slower performance in demanding tasks
Samsung Galaxy A10e
- More efficient chipset (14nm)
- Superior CPU architecture (Cortex-A73 cores)
- Smoother multitasking and app loading
- Better image processing
- Slightly higher price
- May have less RAM in base configuration
- Still an entry-level device with limitations
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for display prowess. Specifications are unavailable for the V10 Vita's display, but given its market segment, it likely features a 720p+ LCD panel. The A10e also utilizes a 720p+ LCD. The key difference lies in the underlying processing power to drive the display; the A10e’s Exynos 7884 will likely handle UI animations and video playback with slightly less stuttering. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget nature.
Camera Comparison
Both devices likely feature basic camera setups. Details are scarce, but the A10e is known to have a 12MP main sensor, which, while not exceptional, is likely superior to the V10 Vita’s sensor given the brand’s image processing expertise. The V10 Vita may include additional sensors for depth or macro photography, but these are typically low-resolution and offer limited practical benefit. Image processing on the A10e will likely produce more consistent and pleasing results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The ZTE Blade V10 Vita’s Unisoc SC9863A, built on a 28nm process, features an octa-core configuration split between 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A10e’s Exynos 7884, fabricated on a more efficient 14nm process, employs a more potent configuration: 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 and 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Cortex-A73 cores in the A10e are significantly more powerful than the A55 cores in the V10 Vita, resulting in faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The 28nm process of the SC9863A will likely lead to higher power consumption and potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for the V10 Vita, but given its positioning, it’s likely around 3000-3500mAh. The A10e features a 3000mAh battery. However, the Exynos 7884’s 14nm process offers better power efficiency than the SC9863A’s 28nm process. This translates to longer battery life for the A10e, despite having a similar capacity. Charging speeds are likely slow on both devices, with neither supporting fast charging technologies.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V10 Vita if you prioritize a potentially lower upfront cost and are primarily focused on very basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media browsing. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A10e if you value a more fluid user experience, better multitasking capabilities, and a chipset built on a more efficient manufacturing process, even if it means spending slightly more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A in the ZTE Blade V10 Vita struggle with modern mobile games?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A is a very entry-level chipset. While it can handle basic games, demanding titles like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile will likely experience significant lag and stuttering, even on low settings. The Exynos 7884 in the A10e will provide a noticeably smoother gaming experience.
❓ Does the Exynos 7884 in the Samsung Galaxy A10e tend to overheat during prolonged use?
The Exynos 7884 is relatively efficient thanks to its 14nm process. While it can get warm during extended gaming sessions or video recording, it’s unlikely to experience significant thermal throttling like the ZTE Blade V10 Vita’s SC9863A, which is built on a less efficient 28nm process.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (A73 vs A55) noticeable in everyday tasks?
Absolutely. The Cortex-A73 cores in the Exynos 7884 are significantly more powerful than the Cortex-A55 cores in the Unisoc SC9863A. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall user experience, especially when multitasking.
