The ZTE Blade V10 Vita and Motorola Moto G7 Play represent two compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality without breaking the bank, but they achieve this through different approaches to chipset design and feature prioritization. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G7 Play emerges as the better choice. While both phones share a similar endurance rating, the Snapdragon 632’s more efficient 14nm process and superior CPU architecture translate to noticeably smoother performance in everyday tasks and a more responsive user experience, justifying its slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 41, 66, 71 - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, March | 2019, February. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.19 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 147.3 x 71.5 x 8 mm (5.80 x 2.81 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 150 g (5.29 oz) | 149 g (5.26 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant (market dependent) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 (market dependent) |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1512 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 81.4 cm2 (~77.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 506 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (64/3GB model only) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Deep indigo, Fine Gold, Starry Black |
| Models | - | XT1952-4, XT1952-5 |
| Price | - | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -90.0dB / Crosstalk -92.9dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1468:1 (nominal), 3.180 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 66dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 81dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 97230 (v7)
GeekBench: 4154 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 7.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V10 Vita
- Potentially lower price point
- Comparable battery endurance rating
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Less powerful Unisoc SC9863A chipset
- Less efficient 28nm process
- Likely slower performance in multitasking and gaming
Motorola Moto G7 Play
- More powerful Snapdragon 632 chipset
- More efficient 14nm process
- Smoother user experience
- Established brand reputation
- Potentially higher price
- Charging speed is limited to 10W
- Camera details are lacking
Display Comparison
Both the ZTE Blade V10 Vita and Motorola Moto G7 Play feature displays with a contrast ratio of 1468:1 (nominal) and 3180:1 (sunlight). This suggests similar outdoor visibility. However, the context data lacks specifics on panel type (IPS, TFT) or resolution. Given the price point, both likely utilize TFT panels. The lack of information on refresh rates suggests both are standard 60Hz displays. Without further data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner; display quality will likely be comparable and adequate for basic use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). In this segment, the lack of information makes a direct comparison impossible. However, given Motorola’s generally more refined image processing algorithms, the Moto G7 Play is likely to produce more consistently pleasing images, even with similar hardware. The absence of details suggests both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual snapshots.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G7 Play’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (14nm) holds a significant advantage over the ZTE Blade V10 Vita’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The 14nm process node of the Snapdragon 632 is considerably more efficient, leading to lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling. Furthermore, the Snapdragon 632’s Kryo 250 CPU architecture – with its combination of performance (Gold) and efficiency (Silver) cores – is more sophisticated than the Unisoc’s Cortex-A55 based design. The G7 Play’s CPU clocks at 1.8GHz versus the Vita’s 1.6GHz/1.2GHz, further emphasizing its performance edge. Users who engage in even moderate multitasking or light gaming will experience a smoother, more responsive experience on the Moto G7 Play.
Battery Life
Both the ZTE Blade V10 Vita and Motorola Moto G7 Play achieve an endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. The Moto G7 Play supports 10W wired charging. The Vita’s charging speed is not specified, but is likely similar. While the battery capacity isn’t listed for either device, the Snapdragon 632’s superior power efficiency means the Moto G7 Play will likely maintain its charge for longer during intensive tasks, despite the identical endurance rating.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V10 Vita if your primary need is a very low-cost device for basic communication and light app usage, and you prioritize minimizing upfront cost above all else. Buy the Motorola Moto G7 Play if you value a more fluid user experience, slightly better performance for multitasking and occasional gaming, and a more established brand reputation for software updates and support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A in the ZTE Blade V10 Vita struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the ZTE Blade V10 Vita can run these apps, the Unisoc SC9863A’s limited processing power may result in slower loading times, occasional lag, and a less fluid experience, especially when multitasking. The Moto G7 Play’s Snapdragon 632 will handle these apps with significantly more ease.
❓ Is the Motorola Moto G7 Play a good option for playing mobile games?
The Moto G7 Play is capable of running less demanding mobile games, but it’s not a gaming powerhouse. The Snapdragon 632 can handle titles like PUBG Mobile at lower settings, but expect frame drops during intense action. The ZTE Blade V10 Vita will likely struggle with even moderately demanding games.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G7 Play with the 10W charger?
With the included 10W charger, expect a full charge from 0% to 100% to take approximately 2.5 to 3 hours. While not fast charging, it’s adequate for overnight charging and provides sufficient power for a full day of typical use.
