Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The ZTE Blade A7P and Motorola Moto G Fast are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto G Fast generally wins due to its superior Snapdragon 665 chipset, offering noticeably better performance and efficiency compared to the ZTE Blade A7P's Helio P22. While both are budget options, the Moto G Fast provides a smoother experience overall.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December | 2020, June 05. Released 2020, June 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.50 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 161.9 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm (6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 189.4 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP
2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Triple | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | - |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3200 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue | Pearl White |
| Models | Z6252CA | XT2045-3 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 90 EUR |
ZTE Blade A7P
- Large Display
- Affordable Price
- Decent Battery Life
- Slow Performance
- Basic Camera
- Outdated Chipset
Motorola Moto G Fast
- Better Performance
- Versatile Camera
- Efficient Chipset
- Clean Software Experience
- Slightly Higher Price
- 10W Charging (Slow)
Display Comparison
The ZTE Blade A7P typically features a larger display (often around 6.5 inches) with a standard resolution. The Moto G Fast usually has a slightly smaller display (around 6.5 inches) but may offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness. Both are likely to be IPS LCD panels.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G Fast generally has a more versatile camera system, often including a main sensor, ultrawide lens, and macro lens. The ZTE Blade A7P's camera is typically more basic, with a single main sensor. Image quality on the Moto G Fast is usually better, especially in low light.
Performance
Here's where the Moto G Fast shines. The Snapdragon 665 is significantly more powerful and efficient than the Helio P22. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Moto G Fast. The ZTE Blade A7P will feel noticeably slower, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones typically offer large batteries (around 5000mAh). Battery life should be comparable, providing a full day of moderate use. However, the Moto G Fast's more efficient chipset may give it a slight edge in overall battery endurance.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade A7P is a good choice for users prioritizing a large display and basic functionality on an extremely tight budget. The Motorola Moto G Fast is ideal for those seeking a more responsive phone with better performance for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Motorola Moto G Fast is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 665 chipset.
❓ Does the ZTE Blade A7P have NFC?
Typically, the ZTE Blade A7P does not include NFC. Check the specific model's specifications to confirm.
❓ What is the difference in software experience?
Motorola is known for its near-stock Android experience, which is generally cleaner and faster than ZTE's custom UI.
