The ZTE Blade A76 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware choices, particularly in their chipsets and battery endurance. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing exceptional battery life and sustained performance under load, the ZTE Blade A76 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Unisoc T8300 chipset, built on a 6nm process, coupled with its impressive 47:24h endurance, provides a clear advantage over the Redmi Note 11R's Dimensity 700.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 03 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.9 x 8.6 mm (6.44 x 2.95 x 0.34 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Yes | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | Z2469N | 22095RA98C |
| Price | £ 150.97 / € 116.90 | About 160 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 47:24h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
ZTE Blade A76
- Exceptional battery life (47:24h endurance)
- More efficient 6nm Unisoc T8300 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Likely slower charging speeds
- Camera performance is unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- Faster 18W wired charging
- MediaTek’s established 5G modem
- Potentially better camera software
- Shorter battery life
- Less efficient 7nm Dimensity 700 chipset
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so we must infer. Both devices likely feature LCD panels given their price bracket. The Redmi Note 11R, based on Xiaomi’s typical offerings, may have a slightly higher refresh rate (potentially 90Hz) than the Blade A76. However, without specific data on brightness, color accuracy, or resolution, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting cost-saving measures in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, so analysis relies on brand tendencies. Xiaomi typically emphasizes camera capabilities even in budget phones, potentially giving the Redmi Note 11R a slight advantage in image processing algorithms. However, without knowing sensor sizes or lens apertures, it’s impossible to assess image quality accurately. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will include a primary camera, an ultrawide, and potentially a depth or macro sensor, but the quality of these secondary sensors is likely to be minimal.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The ZTE Blade A76 utilizes the Unisoc T8300, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm process. This contrasts with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s MediaTek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm node. While both CPUs share the same core configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – the 6nm process gives the Unisoc T8300 a theoretical edge in power efficiency and thermal management. This translates to potentially less throttling during sustained gaming or demanding applications. The Unisoc T8300’s architecture is newer, potentially offering incremental improvements in instruction set efficiency. The Redmi Note 11R benefits from MediaTek’s established 5G modem integration.
Battery Life
The ZTE Blade A76 boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving 47:24 hours in testing and supporting 800 charge cycles. This suggests a larger battery capacity and optimized power management. The Redmi Note 11R compensates with 18W wired charging, offering faster top-ups. However, the faster charging is less impactful if the battery drains more quickly. The Blade A76’s longer endurance is particularly beneficial for users who frequently travel or have limited access to charging outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade A76 if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of heavy use, or even two days of moderate use, and you value consistent performance during extended tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you prioritize faster charging speeds and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery life, and if you frequently utilize fast charging capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T8300 in the ZTE Blade A76 struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Unisoc T8300 isn't a flagship chipset, its Cortex-A78 cores and 6nm process should provide a playable experience in PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings. The 6nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling, allowing for more sustained performance compared to the Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700, though frame rates will likely be lower than on higher-end devices.
❓ How much faster is the 18W charging on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R in real-world usage?
The 18W charging on the Redmi Note 11R will likely take a phone from 0-50% in around 30-45 minutes, depending on usage during charging. However, this benefit is offset by the Redmi Note 11R’s shorter overall battery life. The ZTE Blade A76, while charging slower, will require less frequent charging due to its superior endurance.
❓ Does the ZTE Blade A76 support 5G connectivity?
While not explicitly stated, the Unisoc T8300 chipset inherently supports 5G connectivity. Therefore, it is highly probable that the ZTE Blade A76 does support 5G networks, allowing for faster data speeds where available.
