ZTE Blade A76 vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: A Battery Life and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the ZTE Blade A76 is the clear winner, offering over double the endurance of the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. However, the A23 5G’s 5G capabilities and brighter display make it a better choice for those who frequently stream content or require faster data speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Blade A76 | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 03 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.9 x 8.6 mm (6.44 x 2.95 x 0.34 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA 8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Yes | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | Z2469N | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | £ 150.97 / € 116.90 | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 138h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318821 (v9) GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 47:24h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
ZTE Blade A76
- Exceptional battery life (47:24h endurance)
- Potentially stronger CPU performance with Cortex-A78 cores
- 800 charge cycle rating suggests long-term battery health
- Limited display specifications
- Camera details are unknown
- 5G connectivity is absent
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Brighter display (508 nits)
- Established brand reputation and software support
- Significantly shorter battery life (138h endurance)
- Potentially weaker CPU performance compared to ZTE
- 2MP macro camera offers limited value
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G features a display capable of reaching 508 nits of peak brightness, offering a more visible experience outdoors compared to the ZTE Blade A76 (brightness data unavailable). Both displays share a 1328:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar levels of black depth. However, the A23 5G’s higher brightness is a significant advantage for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight. The ZTE’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and panel technology difficult.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms, a meaningful comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A23 5G is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, and should be considered a marketing feature rather than a substantial upgrade. The ZTE’s camera system remains largely unknown, making it difficult to assess its capabilities relative to the Samsung.
Performance
Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs built on a 6nm process, but their architectures differ significantly. The ZTE Blade A76 employs a Unisoc T8300 with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G with 2x 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x 1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The Cortex-A78 cores in the ZTE are generally considered more performant than the Kryo 660 Gold cores, suggesting a potential edge in CPU-intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 695, however, benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized 5G modem and potentially better software support. The lack of RAM specifications for the ZTE makes a definitive performance comparison challenging.
Battery Life
The ZTE Blade A76 dominates in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 47 hours and 24 minutes of usage on a single charge, and rated for 800 charge cycles. This is more than double the 138-hour endurance rating of the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. While the A23 5G supports 25W wired charging, the ZTE’s charging speed is unspecified. The significantly longer battery life of the ZTE makes it ideal for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency, even if it means slower charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade A76 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and aren't heavily reliant on 5G connectivity. It's ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G if you prioritize 5G access for faster downloads and streaming, and value a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption, even if it means sacrificing battery life.