Google Pixel 7a vs ZTE Blade A76 4G: A Deep Dive into Performance, Camera, and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. Its Tensor G2 chipset and exceptional camera system offer a significantly superior experience. However, the ZTE Blade A76 4G excels in battery endurance, making it a compelling choice for users prioritizing multi-day battery life over raw performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Blade A76 4G | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | Yes | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Yes | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Gold, Violet | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | Z2474 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | € 93.19 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 54:20h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Superior camera performance and image processing
- Faster and more responsive performance with Tensor G2
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Access to Google's latest software updates
- Shorter battery life compared to ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Lower charging wattage than some competitors
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional battery endurance (54:20h)
- High charge cycle count (800 cycles)
- Competitive 22.5W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Significantly slower performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Likely lower display brightness and color accuracy
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s display shines with a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight – a feature the ZTE Blade A76 4G likely cannot match given its market positioning. While the Blade A76 4G’s display specs are unavailable, it’s reasonable to assume a lower peak brightness and potentially a less color-accurate panel. The Pixel 7a’s OLED technology also promises deeper blacks and a more vibrant picture, enhancing media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a major differentiator. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in both photo and video capture, offering features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. The ZTE Blade A76 4G likely offers a more basic camera experience, suitable for casual snapshots but lacking the advanced capabilities of the Pixel 7a. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on the ZTE, the Pixel 7a’s image processing will be the key advantage.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Google Pixel 7a’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) chipset, with its tri-cluster configuration (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55), delivers significantly more processing power than the ZTE Blade A76 4G’s octa-core 1.8 GHz CPU. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor G2 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the Pixel 7a.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the ZTE Blade A76 4G makes its strongest case. Its impressive 54:20h endurance rating, coupled with 800 charge cycles, suggests exceptional longevity. The Pixel 7a, with a reported 76h endurance (older rating, likely lower in real-world use), falls behind. While the Pixel 7a offers 7.5W wireless charging and PD3.0 support for faster wired charging, the Blade A76 4G’s 22.5W wired charging is competitive, and its superior endurance may negate the need for frequent top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade A76 4G if you need a phone that reliably lasts through two full days of moderate use and prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a premium camera experience, smooth performance for demanding apps, and access to Google's latest software features, even if it means charging more frequently.