The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G and ZTE Blade A75 4G represent two distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The A14 5G aims to deliver future-proof connectivity with 5G support, while the Blade A75 4G focuses on providing a solid, reliable experience at an even lower price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is the better choice. Its significantly more powerful Exynos 1330 (or Dimensity 700 depending on region) chipset and 5G connectivity offer a smoother, faster experience that justifies the slightly higher price. However, the ZTE Blade A75 4G remains a viable option for those prioritizing affordability and don't require 5G.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 10 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Basalt Black, Aqua Green, Marble White | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | Z2359 | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | About 110 EUR | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 307886 (v9)
GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- 5G connectivity for future-proof data speeds
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Potentially higher price point
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- Faster charging speed (22.5W)
- More affordable price
- Solid battery endurance
- Significantly less powerful processor
- Limited to 4G connectivity
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a similar contrast ratio of 1334:1, suggesting comparable image quality in terms of blacks and whites. However, the Galaxy A14 5G boasts a significantly brighter display at 519 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Blade A75 4G. This higher peak brightness will translate to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays are adequate for everyday use, the A14 5G offers a more comfortable viewing experience in brighter environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. Without specific sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the A14 5G’s potential for better image processing, stemming from its more powerful chipset, gives it an edge. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A14 5G (if equipped, specification not provided) would further enhance image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The 2MP macro cameras on both devices are likely to offer limited practical benefit due to their low resolution.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G utilizes either the Exynos 1330 (5nm) or the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm), both of which are significantly more powerful than the Unisoc T606 (12nm) found in the ZTE Blade A75 4G. The Exynos 1330’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, provide a noticeable performance boost over the A75 cores in the T606. The smaller fabrication process (5nm vs 12nm) of the Exynos also contributes to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling. This means the A14 5G will handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding apps with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 130 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the difference in charging speeds. The Galaxy A14 5G’s 15W charging is slower than the Blade A75 4G’s 22.5W charging. However, the A14 5G’s more efficient chipset may offset this slower charging speed in real-world usage, potentially leading to comparable total usage time. The faster charging on the Blade A75 4G will provide a quicker top-up when time is limited.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade A75 4G if you primarily need a basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light social media use, and 5G connectivity isn't a priority. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G if you want a more responsive device capable of handling more demanding apps, streaming, and future-proofing your connectivity with 5G support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1330 (or Dimensity 700) in the Galaxy A14 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1330 and Dimensity 700 are capable chipsets, they are not flagship-level processors. Moderate gaming is expected to be fine, but extended, graphically intensive sessions may lead to some thermal throttling. The 5nm (Exynos) and 7nm (Dimensity) fabrication processes help mitigate overheating compared to the 12nm Unisoc T606.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited image quality. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. They can be fun to experiment with, but don't expect professional-looking macro photography.
❓ Will the Galaxy A14 5G support 90fps gameplay in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
The Galaxy A14 5G *may* be able to achieve 60fps in PUBG Mobile with optimized settings. Achieving a consistent 90fps is unlikely, as the chipset isn't powerful enough to maintain that frame rate during intense gameplay. Expect to adjust graphics settings for a smoother experience.
❓ Which phone is better for streaming video content?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is better suited for streaming due to its brighter display and faster processor. The brighter screen will provide a more enjoyable viewing experience, especially in well-lit environments, and the more powerful chipset will ensure smoother playback and faster loading times.
