ZTE Blade A75 4G vs Realme C55: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers

The ZTE Blade A75 4G and Realme C55 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dives deep into their specifications, focusing on performance, battery life, and display quality to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing faster charging and slightly better performance, the Realme C55 emerges as the winner. Its 33W charging capability and Helio G88 chipset provide a noticeable edge over the ZTE Blade A75 4G's 22.5W charging and Unisoc T606. However, the difference isn't massive, and the A75 remains a viable option for basic smartphone needs.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Blade A75 4G Realme C55
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2024, July 102023, March 07
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, JulyAvailable. Released 2023, March 08
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.34 in)165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight189 g (6.67 oz)189.5 g (6.70 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density)
Size6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G52 MC2
OSAndroid 13Android 13, Realme UI 4.0
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual-64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF8 MP, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single8 MP8 MP, (wide)
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging22.5W wired33W wired, 50% in 29 min
Type5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBasalt Black, Aqua Green, Marble WhiteSun Shower, Rainy Night, Rainforest
ModelsZ2359RMX3710
PriceAbout 110 EUR₹ 8,399
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 123h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -31.8 LUFS (Below average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 257263 (v9) GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6) GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Blade A75 4G

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Reliable performance for basic tasks
  • Acceptable battery life

  • Slower charging speed
  • Less powerful chipset compared to the Realme C55
  • Likely lower display brightness

Realme C55

  • Faster 33W charging
  • More powerful Helio G88 chipset
  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility

  • Slightly higher price
  • Camera performance likely similar to ZTE
  • 2MP macro camera offers limited utility

Display Comparison

Both the ZTE Blade A75 4G and Realme C55 feature displays with a 1264:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Realme C55 boasts a measured peak brightness of 659 nits, significantly exceeding what we'd expect from the A75 based on its market positioning. This higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Realme C55’s superior brightness makes it the more comfortable choice in bright environments. Details regarding PWM dimming frequency are unavailable for either device, making it difficult to assess potential eye strain for sensitive users.

Camera Comparison

Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or image processing. Given the budget nature of these phones, we can assume both rely on relatively basic camera setups. The absence of information suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the Realme C55 is a common, but often underwhelming, feature in this price range; its utility is limited. The Realme C55 likely benefits from Mediatek’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially offering slightly better image quality than the ZTE Blade A75 4G.

Performance

The Realme C55’s Mediatek Helio G88 chipset, with its 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offers a performance advantage over the ZTE Blade A75 4G’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The higher clock speeds on the G88’s prime cores will result in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. Both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, so thermal efficiency should be comparable, but the G88’s slightly more powerful GPU will be beneficial for casual gaming. Neither phone is a gaming powerhouse, but the Realme C55 will handle graphically demanding titles with fewer compromises.

Battery Life

Both the ZTE Blade A75 4G and Realme C55 achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Realme C55’s 33W wired charging significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G’s 22.5W charging. Realme claims a 50% charge in just 29 minutes, a substantial advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery. While both phones offer all-day battery life for moderate users, the Realme C55’s faster charging provides greater convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE Blade A75 4G if you need a reliably basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and prioritize a lower initial cost. Buy the Realme C55 if you prefer a phone that can handle moderate multitasking, offers faster charging for quicker top-ups, and provides a slightly smoother user experience, even if it comes at a small price premium.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Unisoc T606 in the ZTE Blade A75 4G struggle with multitasking?
The Unisoc T606 is a capable chipset for basic tasks, but it may exhibit slowdowns when handling numerous apps simultaneously. It's best suited for users who primarily use one or two apps at a time. The Realme C55's Helio G88 will handle multitasking more smoothly.
❓ How significant is the charging speed difference between 22.5W and 33W?
The 33W charging on the Realme C55 is a noticeable improvement. Realme advertises 50% charge in 29 minutes, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G will take considerably longer to reach the same level. This difference is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Can the Realme C55 handle popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile?
The Realme C55 can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate. The Helio G88 is not a high-end gaming chipset, so don't expect a flawless experience. The ZTE Blade A75 4G will likely struggle even more with demanding games.
❓ Is the camera on either phone suitable for taking high-quality photos in low light?
Neither the ZTE Blade A75 4G nor the Realme C55 are expected to excel in low-light photography. Both likely feature basic camera sensors and image processing capabilities. Expect noisy and underexposed photos in challenging lighting conditions.