The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the budget-friendly ZTE Blade A72 5G and the popular OnePlus Nord 2T. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to see which phone reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the clear winner, offering a significantly faster chipset, superior charging speeds, and a brighter display. While the ZTE Blade A72 5G provides 5G connectivity at a lower price point, the Nord 2T's overall performance and features justify its slightly higher cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 10 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 10 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.5 x 9.2 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.36 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 211 g (7.44 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | 7540N | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9)
GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade A72 5G
- Affordable price
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery life
- Less powerful chipset
- Dim display
- Slower charging
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Powerful chipset (Dimensity 1300)
- Fast charging (80W)
- Bright and vibrant display
- Good camera performance
- Higher price than ZTE Blade A72 5G
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a significantly brighter display with a measured peak brightness of 636 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the ZTE Blade A72 5G's display is adequate, it lacks the Nord 2T's vibrancy and outdoor usability. The Nord 2T's contrast ratio is also superior, though technically 'infinite' is a nominal value.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the OnePlus Nord 2T generally produces better image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Nord 2T's image processing algorithms are more refined, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would require further research to provide a definitive comparison.
Performance
Here, the OnePlus Nord 2T takes a commanding lead. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset is considerably more powerful than the ZTE Blade A72 5G's Dimensity 700. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Nord 2T. The Nord 2T's CPU architecture, with its Cortex-A78 cores, is also more efficient for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an impressive endurance rating of 100 hours. However, the OnePlus Nord 2T's 80W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging times compared to the ZTE Blade A72 5G's slower charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade A72 5G is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize 5G connectivity and basic smartphone functionality. The OnePlus Nord 2T is perfect for those seeking a well-rounded experience with strong performance, fast charging, and a capable camera, willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the ZTE Blade A72 5G worth buying?
It's a good option if you're on a very tight budget and need 5G. However, be prepared for compromises in performance and display quality.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The OnePlus Nord 2T's Dimensity 1300 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the ZTE Blade A72 5G's Dimensity 700.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The OnePlus Nord 2T charges incredibly fast with its 80W charging, while the ZTE Blade A72 5G takes considerably longer.