ZTE Blade A72 5G vs Nokia G21: A Detailed Comparison

Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone? The ZTE Blade A72 5G and Nokia G21 are both contenders, offering compelling features at affordable prices. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs and performance to help you decide.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The ZTE Blade A72 5G takes the lead with its 5G connectivity and significantly faster processor. However, the Nokia G21 boasts exceptional battery life and a potentially more refined user experience. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: speed and future-proofing vs. endurance.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Blade A72 5G Nokia G21
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
5G bandsSA/NSA-
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM
Launch
Announced2022, June 102022, February 14
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, June 10Available. Released 2022, February 15
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions164 x 75.5 x 9.2 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.36 in)164.6 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight211 g (7.44 oz)190 g (6.70 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MP1
OSAndroid 11Android 11, upgradable to Android 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDRLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single5 MP8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Triple13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single5 MP8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video720p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
BluetoothYes5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio, RDS
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANYesWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging-18W wired, PD3.0
TypeLi-Ion 4000 mAhLi-Po 5050 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlue, GrayNordic Blue, Dusk
Models7540NTA-1418, TA-1477, TA-1415, TA-1405, TA-1404, TA-1412
PriceAbout 160 EURAbout 90 EUR
SAR-1.00 W/kg (head)     1.10 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.34 W/kg (head)     1.05 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 126h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1631:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -30.7 LUFS (Below average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 171299 (v9) GeekBench: 1193 (v5.1) GFXBench: 8.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Blade A72 5G

  • 5G Connectivity
  • Faster Processor (Dimensity 700)
  • Potentially better gaming performance
  • More future-proof

  • Likely lower battery life
  • Camera performance unknown
  • May have a less refined UI

Nokia G21

  • Exceptional Battery Life (126h endurance)
  • Clean Android Experience
  • Reliable Performance for everyday tasks
  • Good Outdoor Visibility (500 nits)

  • Slower Processor (Unisoc T606)
  • Less powerful for gaming
  • Lacks 5G connectivity

Display Comparison

Both phones feature large displays with impressive contrast ratios (1631:1). However, the Nokia G21's measured 500 nits brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility. The Blade A72 5G likely has a standard HD+ resolution, while the G21 probably has an equivalent resolution. Color accuracy and overall display quality are likely comparable, leaning towards the Nokia due to the brightness.

Camera Comparison

Camera specs are not detailed, but both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities. The Nokia G21 likely benefits from Nokia's reputation for reliable camera software and image processing. The ZTE Blade A72 5G might offer slightly higher resolution sensors, but overall camera performance will depend on software optimization and image processing algorithms. Expect decent results from both, but not flagship-level quality.

Performance

Here's where the ZTE Blade A72 5G shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Unisoc T606 in the Nokia G21. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the ZTE. The Dimensity 700's 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency despite the increased performance.

Battery Life

The Nokia G21 is the clear winner in this category. Its endurance rating of 126 hours is exceptional, suggesting it can easily last for multiple days on a single charge. The ZTE Blade A72 5G, while likely having a decent battery capacity, will struggle to match the G21's longevity due to its more power-hungry processor.

Buying Guide

The ZTE Blade A72 5G is ideal for users who want 5G connectivity and a smoother, faster experience for gaming and multitasking. The Nokia G21 is perfect for those prioritizing long battery life, a clean Android experience, and reliable performance for everyday tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the ZTE Blade A72 5G worth it for gaming?
Yes, the Blade A72 5G's Dimensity 700 chipset offers significantly better gaming performance than the Nokia G21's Unisoc T606. However, don't expect flagship-level gaming experiences.
❓ How long will the Nokia G21's battery last?
The Nokia G21 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 126 hours, meaning it can easily last for 2-3 days on a single charge with moderate usage.