The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the ZTE Blade A71 and the Xiaomi Redmi 9. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi 9 emerges as the clear winner. While the ZTE Blade A71 is a decent budget option, the Redmi 9's superior chipset, faster charging, and generally better camera performance make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 07 | 2020, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 07 | Available. Released 2020, June 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.2 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 163.3 x 77 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio (no wired headphones required) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray, Green | Carbon Gray, Sunset Purple, Ocean Green, Pink/Blue |
| Models | A7030 | M2004J19G, M2004J19C |
| Price | About 90 EUR | $ 105.77 / £ 196.62 / € 115.51 |
| SAR | - | 0.91 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.71 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1624:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 201829 (v8)
GeekBench: 1325 (v5.1) |
ZTE Blade A71
- Affordable
- Large Display
- Basic Functionality
- Weak Performance
- Limited Camera Capabilities
- No Fast Charging
- Unknown Battery Capacity
Xiaomi Redmi 9
- Better Performance (Helio G80)
- Improved Camera
- Long Battery Life (131h Endurance)
- Fast Charging (18W)
- More Versatile
- Display Brightness Could Be Better
- Still a Budget Phone (Limited Features)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays with a nominal contrast ratio of 1624:1. However, the Redmi 9 boasts a measured max brightness of 328 nits, suggesting slightly better visibility in bright conditions. The Blade A71's display is likely adequate but may lack the same vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
While both offer 'Photo/Video' capabilities, the Redmi 9 is expected to have a more versatile camera system. The Helio G80 chipset often supports better image processing. The Blade A71's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots, but the Redmi 9 should deliver superior image quality, especially in low light.
Performance
The Redmi 9's Mediatek Helio G80 chipset (12nm) significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A71's Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The G80's Cortex-A75 cores provide a noticeable boost in processing power, resulting in smoother multitasking and better gaming performance. The Blade A71 will feel sluggish by comparison.
Battery Life
The Redmi 9 shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 131 hours. While the Blade A71's battery capacity is unknown, the Redmi 9's impressive endurance suggests a larger battery and efficient power management. The Redmi 9 also supports 18W wired charging, a significant advantage over the Blade A71 which likely lacks fast charging.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade A71 is a good option for users prioritizing a very basic smartphone experience and extremely tight budgets. The Xiaomi Redmi 9 is ideal for those seeking a more well-rounded device with better performance, a more capable camera, and longer battery life, without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the ZTE Blade A71 good for gaming?
No, the Blade A71's chipset is not powerful enough for demanding games. It's best suited for basic apps and light usage.
❓ Does the Redmi 9 have a good camera?
The Redmi 9 offers a decent camera system for its price range, providing better image quality and more features than the Blade A71.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Xiaomi Redmi 9 has significantly better battery life, with an endurance rating of 131 hours.