ZTE Blade A54 vs. Infinix Smart 7 HD: A Deep Dive into Two Ultra-Affordable Smartphones

The ZTE Blade A54 and Infinix Smart 7 HD represent the extreme end of the budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they take slightly different approaches. This comparison dissects their specifications to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing affordability and basic functionality.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a slightly more capable all-around experience, the ZTE Blade A54 emerges as the better choice. Its Unisoc SC9863A chipset, while not a powerhouse, offers a more defined architecture than the vaguely specified CPU in the Infinix Smart 7 HD, potentially leading to smoother multitasking and app performance.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Blade A54 Infinix Smart 7 HD
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
Launch
Announced2023, September2023, April 14
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, NovemberAvailable. Released 2023, April 14
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions164 x 75.8 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in)163.9 x 75.5 x 8.7 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.34 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight185 g (6.53 oz)196.5 g (6.95 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)
Size6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 500 nits
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core 1.6 GHz
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863A (28 nm)-
GPUIMG8322-
OSAndroid 13Android 12 (Go edition)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM64GB 2GB RAM
 -UFS 2.1
Main Camera
Dual-8 MP, f/2.0 0.08 MP, (depth)
FeaturesLED flash, HDRDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single13 MP, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens8 MP, f/2.0 Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-LED flash
Single2 MP (interpolated to 5 MP)5 MP, f/2.0
VideoYes720p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)No
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometerFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging-10W wired
Type5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGray, Blue, LilacInk Black, Silk Blue, Jade White, Green Apple
Models-X6516
PriceAbout 90 EURAbout 110 EUR

ZTE Blade A54

  • Known chipset architecture (Unisoc SC9863A) for potential software optimization.
  • Potentially smoother multitasking due to the octa-core processor.
  • More detailed specifications available for analysis.

  • Display specifications are unknown.
  • Likely limited RAM and storage.

Infinix Smart 7 HD

  • Potentially longer battery life due to lower performance demands.
  • Simple and straightforward user experience.
  • 10W charging provides a basic charging solution.

  • Vague CPU specifications raise concerns about performance and efficiency.
  • Limited information available about display quality.
  • Likely limited RAM and storage.

Display Comparison

Both devices likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, detailed display specifications like resolution, brightness, and color gamut are unavailable for the Infinix Smart 7 HD. The ZTE Blade A54’s display details are also missing, but given the price point, expectations should be tempered. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, and color accuracy will likely be standard for budget displays. Without specific data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner; both will likely offer a functional, but not exceptional, viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Camera specifications are sparse for both devices. It’s safe to assume both will feature a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth or macro sensor. However, without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The prevalence of low-resolution secondary cameras (often 2MP) in this segment suggests limited utility beyond basic depth effects. Image quality will likely be acceptable in good lighting conditions but will struggle in low light on both devices.

Performance

The ZTE Blade A54’s Unisoc SC9863A chipset is a 28nm octa-core processor with a split core configuration: four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6GHz and four at 1.2GHz. This architecture, while not high-end, provides a degree of efficiency and allows for multitasking. The Infinix Smart 7 HD only lists an octa-core 1.6GHz CPU without specifying the architecture. This lack of detail is concerning; it could indicate a less efficient or older core design. The ZTE’s known architecture suggests better potential for software optimization and a more predictable performance profile. RAM details are missing for both, but likely limited, further emphasizing the ZTE’s architectural advantage.

Battery Life

The Infinix Smart 7 HD includes 10W wired charging, a relatively slow charging speed by today’s standards. Battery capacity for both devices is unknown. However, given the lower performance demands of the Infinix Smart 7 HD, it may achieve comparable or even slightly better battery life than the ZTE Blade A54, despite potentially having a smaller capacity. The 10W charging will result in longer charge times for the Infinix, requiring several hours to reach a full charge.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE Blade A54 if you need a device capable of handling more than just the most basic tasks, and appreciate a chipset with a known architecture for potential software updates. Buy the Infinix Smart 7 HD if your primary need is a functional smartphone for calls, texts, and light social media use, and you prioritize simplicity and potentially longer battery life due to lower performance demands.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Unisoc SC9863A chipset in the ZTE Blade A54 capable of running popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A is designed to handle everyday tasks like running social media apps, browsing the web, and making calls without significant issues. While it won't offer a high-end gaming experience, it's sufficient for basic smartphone functionality.
❓ Does the Infinix Smart 7 HD support dual SIM functionality, allowing me to use two phone numbers simultaneously?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specifications, Infinix Smart phones in this price range *typically* support dual SIM functionality. However, it's crucial to verify this feature with the retailer or Infinix's official website before purchasing, as configurations can vary by region.
❓ What type of storage does the ZTE Blade A54 use, and is it expandable via microSD card?
Storage type and microSD card support are not specified. However, budget smartphones often include eMMC storage, which is slower than UFS. MicroSD card support is common in this segment, but again, should be confirmed before purchase to ensure you can expand storage if needed.