Looking for an affordable smartphone? The ZTE Blade A52 and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G both offer compelling options, but cater to different needs. This comparison dives deep into their features to help you determine which device best suits your budget and priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the clear winner, offering significantly better performance, a superior camera, faster charging, and a brighter display. While the ZTE Blade A52 is a budget-friendly option, the A52 5G's overall value and features justify its higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 10 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 10 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~78.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 13 MP, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Silk Gold, Crystal Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A526B, SM-A526B/DS, SM-A5260, SM-A526W, SM-A526U, SM-A526U1 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | $ 137.39 / £ 280.00 / € 115.49 |
| SAR | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 111h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 334981 (v8), 386474 (v9)
GeekBench: 1820 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade A52
- Extremely affordable
- Decent battery life (claimed)
- Lightweight design
- Weak performance
- Basic camera
- Slow charging
- Low-resolution display
- Outdated chipset
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- 5G connectivity
- Powerful processor
- Excellent camera
- Fast charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Good battery life
- Higher price
- Potentially larger size/weight
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G boasts a significantly brighter display (787 nits) with an 'infinite' contrast ratio, providing vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Blade A52's display is likely more basic, lacking the same level of brightness and contrast. The A52 5G also likely has a higher resolution and potentially an adaptive refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A52 5G's camera system is expected to be considerably better, offering higher resolution photos and videos, improved low-light performance, and potentially additional features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The Blade A52's camera is likely more basic, suitable for casual snapshots but lacking the advanced capabilities of the A52 5G.
Performance
The Snapdragon 750G 5G chipset in the Galaxy A52 5G offers a substantial performance advantage over the Unisoc SC9863A in the Blade A52. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A52 5G. The Kryo 570 cores are significantly more powerful than the Cortex-A55 cores in the Blade A52.
Battery Life
Both phones claim an endurance rating of 111h, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Galaxy A52 5G's 25W fast charging is a significant advantage, allowing for much quicker top-ups compared to the Blade A52's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade A52 is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and affordability. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is perfect for those seeking a well-rounded mid-range phone with 5G connectivity, a great camera, and a smooth user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the ZTE Blade A52 good for gaming?
No, the Blade A52's chipset is not powerful enough for demanding games. It can handle basic games, but expect lag and low frame rates.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G have a headphone jack?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G includes a 3.5mm headphone jack.
❓ What is the difference between 4G and 5G?
5G is the next generation of mobile network technology, offering significantly faster speeds and lower latency compared to 4G. The Galaxy A52 5G supports 5G connectivity, while the Blade A52 is limited to 4G.
