The ZTE Blade A52 and LG Stylo 6 represent the lower end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability. Both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with significantly different hardware approaches. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the LG Stylo 6 emerges as the slightly better choice. While the ZTE Blade A52 benefits from a newer manufacturing process, the LG Stylo 6’s Helio P35 chipset, with its higher clock speeds, delivers a more responsive user experience in everyday tasks, making it the more practical option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 10 | 2020, May 20. Released 2020, May 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 10 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) | 171.2 x 77.7 x 8.6 mm (6.74 x 3.06 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| | - | Stylus |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~78.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Gray, Silk Gold, Crystal Blue | White |
| Models | - | LMQ730TM, LM-Q730TM |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 200 EUR |
ZTE Blade A52
- Potentially longer software support due to newer chipset.
- More modern chipset architecture (Cortex-A55)
- Lower manufacturing process (28nm) - theoretically better efficiency
- Slower CPU clock speeds.
- Slower 10W charging.
- Likely lower camera performance.
LG Stylo 6
- Faster CPU clock speeds for improved responsiveness.
- More efficient chipset (Helio P35, 12nm).
- Potentially faster charging (15W).
- Older chipset architecture (Cortex-A53).
- May receive fewer software updates.
- Larger size may not suit all users.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Specifications are unavailable for panel type or brightness, but given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. The focus here is on functionality rather than fidelity. The LG Stylo 6’s larger screen size (typically 6.8 inches vs the Blade A52’s 6.5 inches, based on market trends) will be preferable for media consumption, though this comes at the cost of potentially lower pixel density. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Details on sensor sizes are unavailable, but both likely feature basic camera setups focused on capturing acceptable images in good lighting conditions. The LG Stylo 6 often includes a 13MP main sensor, while the ZTE Blade A52 typically features an 8MP sensor. The aperture on the LG Stylo 6 is likely wider, allowing for better low-light performance. Both devices will likely include 2MP macro/depth sensors, which offer minimal practical benefit. Image processing will be basic on both, prioritizing speed over quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The LG Stylo 6’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm) utilizes a more mature, but faster, CPU configuration – four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, paired with four at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts with the ZTE Blade A52’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), which features a slower octa-core setup of 1.6 GHz and 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 12nm process of the Helio P35 offers better power efficiency than the 28nm process of the Unisoc chip, despite the higher clock speeds. This translates to a more fluid experience when multitasking or launching applications on the LG Stylo 6. While the Unisoc chip is newer, the architectural advantages of the Helio P35 are more impactful in real-world usage.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is a critical factor in this segment. While specific mAh ratings are unavailable, both devices likely feature batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The LG Stylo 6’s more efficient Helio P35 chipset will likely translate to slightly longer battery life. However, the ZTE Blade A52’s 10W charging is significantly slower than the LG Stylo 6’s typical 15W charging, meaning longer times to reach a full charge. A full 0-100% charge on the ZTE Blade A52 could take upwards of 3 hours, while the LG Stylo 6 may achieve a full charge in around 2.5 hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade A52 if you prioritize a potentially longer software support lifecycle due to its newer chipset architecture, and are comfortable with slightly slower performance. Buy the LG Stylo 6 if you value a more responsive user experience for daily tasks like browsing and social media, and appreciate the slightly more powerful CPU for the price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A in the ZTE Blade A52 struggle with multitasking?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A’s slower CPU clock speeds and less efficient architecture mean it will likely exhibit noticeable lag when switching between multiple apps or running demanding applications. The LG Stylo 6’s Helio P35 is better equipped to handle multitasking.
❓ Is the camera on either of these phones good enough for casual social media use?
Both cameras are adequate for basic social media sharing in good lighting conditions. However, expect limited detail and dynamic range. Low-light performance will be poor on both devices. The LG Stylo 6’s potentially larger sensor and wider aperture may offer a slight advantage.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the ZTE Blade A52 with its 10W charging?
Given the 10W charging rate and likely battery capacity (3000-4000 mAh), a full 0-100% charge on the ZTE Blade A52 could take approximately 3 to 3.5 hours. This is significantly slower than the LG Stylo 6’s typical 15W charging.
❓ Does the LG Stylo 6 support fast charging beyond 15W?
No, the LG Stylo 6 typically supports up to 15W charging. While not 'fast' by modern standards, it's still considerably quicker than the ZTE Blade A52's 10W charging. Using a higher wattage charger will not result in faster charging speeds.
