The ZTE Blade series consistently delivers affordable smartphones, and the A52 and A52 Lite are no exception. But which one offers the best value for your money? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and overall user experience to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Blade A52 edges out the A52 Lite thanks to its identified chipset (Unisoc SC9863A) and 10W charging. While both offer similar core functionality, the A52's slightly more defined specs and charging capability provide a marginal advantage for those seeking a bit more performance and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 20 | 2022, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August | Available. Released 2022, June 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 168 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 214 g (7.55 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~78.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green | Space Gray, Silk Gold, Crystal Blue |
| Price | - | About 90 EUR |
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Lowest Price
- Decent Battery Life
- Large Display
- Unspecified Chipset
- Slower Charging
- Basic Performance
ZTE Blade A52
- Identified Chipset (Unisoc SC9863A)
- Faster 10W Charging
- Slightly Better Performance
- Higher Price
- Similar Camera Quality to A52 Lite
- Still a Budget Phone
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). Expect comparable viewing experiences, though the A52 might have slightly better color accuracy due to its chipset's capabilities. Screen size is likely around 6.5 inches for both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are likely similar, with both featuring a primary rear camera around 13MP and a secondary depth sensor. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing, and both are likely to struggle in low-light conditions. The A52's chipset *might* offer slightly better image processing capabilities.
Performance
The A52's Unisoc SC9863A chipset, while not a powerhouse, provides a more defined performance profile compared to the A52 Lite's generic 'Octa-core' designation. Expect slightly smoother multitasking and app loading on the A52. Both will handle basic tasks well.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 5000mAh. However, the A52's 10W wired charging provides a faster charging experience compared to the A52 Lite, which likely charges at a slower rate (potentially 5W). This is a significant advantage for the A52.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade A52 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing the absolute lowest price point and basic smartphone functionality. The ZTE Blade A52 is a better choice for those who want a slightly more robust chipset and faster charging, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the ZTE Blade A52 and A52 Lite?
The main differences are the chipset (Unisoc SC9863A in the A52 vs. unspecified in the A52 Lite) and charging speed (10W in the A52 vs. likely slower in the A52 Lite). The A52 offers slightly better performance and faster charging.
❓ Which ZTE Blade A52 model is better for gaming?
The ZTE Blade A52 is slightly better for gaming due to its more defined chipset, although neither phone is designed for demanding games. Expect basic games to run smoothly on both.
