Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The ZTE Blade A52 Lite and Xiaomi Redmi 9A are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi 9A edges out the ZTE Blade A52 Lite thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset, faster charging, and generally better overall value. While both are budget options, the Redmi 9A provides a more polished experience for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 20 | 2020, June 30. Released 2020, July 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm (6.49 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | Yes | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green | Carbon Gray (Midnight Black), Sky Blue (Sea Blue), Ocean Green (Nature Green) |
| Models | - | M2006C3LG, M2006C3LI, M2006C3LC, M2004C3L |
| Price | - | € 64.30 / $ 56.50 / £ 95.56 |
| SAR | - | 0.90 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Simple and easy to use
- Large display
- Decent battery life
- Underpowered processor
- Slow charging
- Basic camera
Xiaomi Redmi 9A
- Better performance than ZTE
- Faster charging
- Slightly better camera
- Good value for money
- Still an entry-level phone
- Limited gaming capabilities
- Basic display
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large 6.53-inch displays, likely with HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles but don't anticipate vibrant colors or high brightness. The Redmi 9A might have a slightly better panel due to Xiaomi's generally more refined display technology, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi 9A typically features a 13MP main camera, often accompanied by a depth sensor. The ZTE Blade A52 Lite likely has a similar setup. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The Redmi 9A's image processing might be slightly better.
Performance
The Redmi 9A's Mediatek Helio G25 chipset, while still entry-level, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the ZTE Blade A52 Lite's generic octa-core processor. Expect smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times on the Redmi 9A. Gaming performance will be limited on both, but the Redmi 9A will handle basic games better.
Battery Life
Both phones boast large 5000mAh batteries, promising all-day battery life. However, the Redmi 9A's 10W wired charging provides a faster charging experience compared to the ZTE Blade A52 Lite, which likely lacks fast charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade A52 Lite is a good choice for users prioritizing a simple, straightforward phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. The Xiaomi Redmi 9A is ideal for those needing a bit more performance for multitasking, slightly better camera capabilities, and faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both offer excellent battery life thanks to their 5000mAh batteries. Expect a full day of use on either device.
❓ Can I play games on these phones?
Both are suitable for basic games. The Redmi 9A handles slightly more demanding titles better due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ Which phone is easier to use for seniors?
The ZTE Blade A52 Lite's simplicity might appeal to some seniors, but both phones offer user-friendly interfaces.
