ZTE Blade A52 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: A Detailed Showdown

Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone? The ZTE Blade A52 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G are both contenders, but they cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which one is right for you.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is the clear winner, offering significantly better performance, a superior camera, and 5G connectivity. While the ZTE Blade A52 Lite is more affordable, the A52 5G's overall value and features justify the price difference for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Blade A52 Lite Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2022, August 202021, March 17
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, AugustAvailable. Released 2021, March 19
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back
Dimensions164.8 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.34 in)159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight188 g (6.63 oz)189 g (6.67 oz)
 -IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density)
Size6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM)
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-coreOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570)
Chipset-Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)
GPU-Adreno 619
OSAndroid 11 (Go edition)Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal32GB 2GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single13 MP, AF-
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single5 MP32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video720p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
BluetoothYes5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio (market/region dependent)
USBYesUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANYesWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging-25W wired, 50% in 30 min
TypeLi-Ion 4000 mAhLi-Po 4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsGray, GreenAwesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue
Models-SM-A526B, SM-A526B/DS, SM-A5260, SM-A526W, SM-A526U, SM-A526U1
Price-$ 137.39 / £ 280.00 / € 115.49
SAR-0.74 W/kg (head)     0.53 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-1.05 W/kg (head)     1.42 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 111h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -27.5 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 334981 (v8), 386474 (v9) GeekBench: 1820 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Blade A52 Lite

  • Very affordable
  • Octa-core processor
  • Decent battery life (claimed)

  • Lower performance
  • Basic camera
  • Likely lower display quality
  • No 5G connectivity
  • Slower charging

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

  • 5G connectivity
  • Powerful Snapdragon 750G processor
  • Excellent display
  • Good camera system
  • Fast charging (25W)
  • Reputable brand

  • More expensive
  • Battery life, while good, not significantly better than budget options

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G boasts a significantly brighter display (787 nits) with an 'infinite' contrast ratio, providing a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The Blade A52 Lite likely has a standard LCD panel with lower brightness and contrast, resulting in less impressive visuals. The A52 5G also likely has better color accuracy.

Camera Comparison

While both phones have 'Photo / Video' capabilities listed, the Galaxy A52 5G is expected to have a much better camera system. It likely features higher resolution sensors, improved image processing, and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Blade A52 Lite's camera is likely more basic.

Performance

The Galaxy A52 5G's Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Blade A52 Lite's octa-core processor. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A52 5G. The Kryo 570 cores in the A52 5G offer a significant performance boost.

Battery Life

Both phones claim an endurance rating of 111h, which is impressive. However, the Galaxy A52 5G also supports 25W fast charging, allowing for quicker top-ups (50% in 30 minutes), a feature likely absent in the Blade A52 Lite.

Buying Guide

The ZTE Blade A52 Lite is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize affordability above all else and don't need advanced features. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is perfect for those seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a good camera, fast performance, and future-proof 5G connectivity, even if it means spending a bit more.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the ZTE Blade A52 Lite worth buying?
It's a good option if you're on a very tight budget and only need basic smartphone functionality. However, consider the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G if you can stretch your budget for a significantly better experience.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G support 5G?
Yes, as the name suggests, the Galaxy A52 5G is designed for 5G connectivity, offering faster download and upload speeds where available.