The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for those seeking essential features without breaking the bank. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the ZTE Blade A51 and the Motorola Moto E13. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the winner.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto E13 edges out the ZTE Blade A51 thanks to its more efficient chipset and slightly better overall performance. While both are budget options, the E13's Unisoc T606 provides a smoother experience, making it the preferable choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 08 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 08 | Available. Released 2023, February 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.5 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.56 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173.7 g (6.14 oz) | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, AF
2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green |
| Price | - | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 |
ZTE Blade A51
- Large Display
- Affordable Price
- Decent Battery Life
- Outdated Chipset
- Limited Performance
- Basic Camera
Motorola Moto E13
- More Efficient Chipset
- Better Performance
- Modern Design
- 10W Charging
- Still a Budget Phone
- Limited Gaming Capabilities
- Basic Camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, likely around 6.5 inches, with HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles but limited color accuracy. The Moto E13 might have a slightly more modern display panel, potentially offering better brightness and contrast, but both are adequate for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a primary rear camera around 13MP. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The Moto E13 might have slightly better image processing due to its newer chipset.
Performance
This is where the Moto E13 shines. The Unisoc T606's 12nm process and Cortex-A75 cores provide a noticeable performance boost over the Blade A51's 28nm SC9863A and Cortex-A55-only setup. Expect smoother multitasking and app loading on the E13. Gaming performance will be limited on both, but slightly better on the E13.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature batteries around 5000mAh, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. However, the Moto E13's more efficient chipset should translate to slightly better battery endurance.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade A51 is a good option for users prioritizing a large display and basic functionality on an extremely tight budget. The Motorola Moto E13 is ideal for those seeking a slightly more responsive experience, better battery efficiency, and a more modern design, even within the budget category.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Motorola Moto E13 is slightly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset, although neither phone is designed for demanding games.
❓ What is the difference between the chipsets?
The Moto E13's Unisoc T606 uses a more modern 12nm process and includes Cortex-A75 cores, offering significantly better performance compared to the ZTE Blade A51's older 28nm SC9863A with only Cortex-A55 cores.
