The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the ZTE Blade A5 2020 and the Samsung Galaxy A10. But which one delivers the best experience for your hard-earned cash? Let's dive in.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A10 edges out the ZTE Blade A5 2020 thanks to its superior chipset, slightly better performance, and the Samsung brand reputation. While both are budget options, the A10 offers a more polished and reliable experience overall, justifying its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 4, 5, 7, 28, 66 - USA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 16. Released 2020, July 16 | 2019, February 28. Released 2019, March 19 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 156.7 x 72.6 x 8 mm (6.17 x 2.86 x 0.31 in) | 155.6 x 75.6 x 7.9 mm (6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~80.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Exynos 7884 (14 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 9.0/ Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.4 | 13 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.4 | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3200 mAh | Li-Ion 3400 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Blue, Black, Red, Gold |
| Models | - | SM-A105F, SM-A105G, SM-A105M, SM-A105FN |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.19 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.48 W/kg (head) | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 32GB 2GB RAM | - | $ 122.17 |
ZTE Blade A5 2020
- Extremely affordable
- Decent battery life
- Sufficient storage (expandable)
- Slow performance
- Mediocre display
- Basic camera quality
- Less polished software
Samsung Galaxy A10
- Better performance
- Improved camera
- Samsung brand reliability
- Slightly better display
- Slightly more expensive
- Limited RAM (2GB)
- Plastic build
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.2-inch HD+ display (720 x 1520 pixels). While the resolution is similar, the Samsung Galaxy A10's display often exhibits slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles due to Samsung's display technology. The ZTE Blade A5 2020's display is adequate but can appear a bit washed out in certain lighting conditions.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A10 typically features a 13MP main camera, while the ZTE Blade A5 2020 has a 13MP main camera as well. However, Samsung's image processing algorithms generally produce better results, with more vibrant colors and better dynamic range. The A10 also often includes a depth sensor for improved portrait mode shots. Front cameras are both 5MP.
Performance
Here's where the Samsung Galaxy A10 truly shines. Its Exynos 7884 chipset (14nm) is significantly more powerful than the ZTE Blade A5 2020's Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The A10's Cortex-A73 cores provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness and multitasking capabilities. The Blade A5 2020 can feel sluggish, especially when running multiple apps or demanding games.
Battery Life
Both phones have a 4000mAh battery. Battery life is generally comparable, offering a full day of moderate use. However, the Samsung Galaxy A10's more efficient chipset can sometimes provide slightly longer battery life under heavy load.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade A5 2020 is a good choice for users prioritizing an extremely low price point and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A10 is ideal for those seeking a more reliable and slightly faster phone with a better camera and the benefits of the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the ZTE Blade A5 2020 good for gaming?
No, the ZTE Blade A5 2020's chipset is not powerful enough for demanding games. It can handle basic games, but expect low frame rates and lag.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A10 generally receives better and longer software updates due to Samsung's commitment to supporting its devices.
❓ Can I expand the storage on either phone?
Yes, both phones support microSD card expansion, allowing you to increase the storage capacity.
❓ Which phone is more durable?
While neither phone is exceptionally durable, the Samsung Galaxy A10's build quality feels slightly more robust.