ZTE Blade 20 Pro 5G vs OnePlus Nord N10 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a slightly more capable chipset, the ZTE Blade 20 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 765G offers a noticeable step up in CPU and GPU performance compared to the Nord N10’s Snapdragon 690, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Nord N10’s 30W charging is a significant advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Blade 20 Pro 5G | OnePlus Nord N10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 30. Released 2021, January 04 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.47 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 10, MiFavor 10 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue | Midnight Ice |
| Models | - | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279579 (v8) GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade 20 Pro 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G processor
- Potentially better gaming performance
- QC4 support for compatible chargers
- Slower 18W charging
- Missing display specifications
- Camera specs are unknown
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- Faster 30W charging
- Measured display brightness available
- OxygenOS software experience
- Less powerful Snapdragon 690 processor
- Potentially lower gaming performance
- Camera specs are unknown
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 440 nits and a 1447:1 contrast ratio. While these are respectable figures, the ZTE Blade 20 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, leaving a gap in direct comparison. However, given the ZTE’s positioning, it’s likely to offer a similar, if not slightly lower, brightness level. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery efficiency rather than visual fluidity. Without further data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Nord N10’s measured brightness provides a concrete data point.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones include a primary camera, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the quality will depend heavily on the sensor and image processing. The absence of detailed specs suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera powerhouse. We can infer that the ZTE, with its more powerful processor, *could* potentially handle more complex image processing algorithms, but this is speculative.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The ZTE Blade 20 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G (7nm), featuring a Kryo 475 octa-core CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.4 GHz. This is a more powerful processor than the OnePlus Nord N10 5G’s Snapdragon 690 (8nm) with its Kryo 560 octa-core CPU peaking at 2.0 GHz. The 7nm process node of the 765G, while older, is offset by the higher clock speeds and core configuration, resulting in superior multi-core and single-core performance. The 8nm Snapdragon 690 prioritizes efficiency, but the ZTE offers a clear advantage for users who multitask or play graphically intensive games. The Snapdragon 765G also includes a more capable Adreno 620 GPU compared to the 690’s Adreno 619.
Battery Life
Both the ZTE Blade 20 Pro 5G and the OnePlus Nord N10 5G achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The ZTE supports 18W wired charging with QC4, while the OnePlus Nord N10 5G boasts 30W wired charging. This means the Nord N10 5G will significantly reduce charging times, offering a more convenient experience for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade 20 Pro 5G if you need a phone capable of handling more demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and value CPU/GPU performance over ultra-fast charging. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you prioritize quick top-ups with its 30W charging, appreciate OnePlus’ OxygenOS software, and are a lighter user who doesn’t push their phone to its limits.