The smartphone landscape is crowded with options, but the choice often boils down to balancing performance with price. We're comparing the ZTE Blade 10 Prime, a veteran of the budget segment, against the newer Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), which aims to deliver 5G connectivity and modern features at an accessible price point. This comparison focuses on how the generational leap in chipsets and charging technology impacts the user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset offers significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the ZTE Blade 10 Prime’s Helio P60, coupled with dramatically faster 68W charging and a much brighter display. While the Blade 10 Prime remains a viable option for basic tasks, the Moto G Stylus 5G provides a future-proofed experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, November | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158 x 75.2 x 7.9 mm (6.22 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD2.0 | 68W wired
15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 3200 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | Z6530, Z6530M, Z6530V | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
ZTE Blade 10 Prime
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- PD2.0 charging support
- Outdated Helio P60 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely inferior display quality
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset
- Ultra-fast 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Bright 1870 nit display
- Potentially higher price
- May include bloatware (typical for Motorola)
- Stylus may not be useful for all users
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1870 nits, making it easily viewable outdoors even in direct sunlight. The ZTE Blade 10 Prime’s display specifications are not provided, but based on its market segment, it likely falls far short of this brightness level. While panel technology details are missing for both, the Moto G Stylus 5G’s brightness alone represents a substantial advantage for users who consume media on the go. The lack of information on the Blade 10 Prime’s refresh rate suggests it’s likely capped at 60Hz, while the Moto G Stylus 5G could potentially offer a smoother experience if it incorporates a higher refresh rate panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s positioning, it's reasonable to expect a more advanced camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The ZTE Blade 10 Prime likely relies on a simpler camera setup, potentially prioritizing megapixel count over sensor size and image quality. Image processing capabilities will also favor the Motorola, leveraging Qualcomm’s ISP for better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) utilizes the Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm), featuring a more modern CPU architecture with 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts sharply with the ZTE Blade 10 Prime’s Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12nm) and its older Cortex-A73/A53 configuration. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning less throttling during sustained workloads. The A78 cores in the Motorola offer a substantial performance uplift over the A73 cores in the ZTE, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) shines in the charging department with 68W wired charging and 15W wireless charging. This allows for incredibly fast top-ups, significantly reducing downtime. The ZTE Blade 10 Prime’s 18W wired charging, while adequate, is considerably slower. The Moto G Stylus 5G also demonstrates impressive battery life with a 10:05h active use score, suggesting efficient power management alongside the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3’s 4nm process. While the Blade 10 Prime’s battery capacity is unknown, the Motorola’s combination of efficiency and fast charging provides a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade 10 Prime if you need a functional smartphone for very basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you prioritize performance for multitasking, gaming, and streaming, demand faster charging speeds, and want a brighter, more vibrant display, especially if 5G connectivity is a must-have.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 in the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) handle demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 isn't a flagship chipset, it's a substantial upgrade over the Helio P60. It can run Genshin Impact at medium settings with playable frame rates. However, expect some frame drops during intense combat scenarios. The ZTE Blade 10 Prime would struggle significantly with such a demanding title.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) from 0%?
With 68W charging, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) can go from 0% to 100% in approximately 45-60 minutes. This is a massive improvement over the ZTE Blade 10 Prime, which would likely take over 2 hours with its 18W charging.
❓ Is the stylus on the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) actually useful for everyday tasks?
The stylus offers added functionality for note-taking, sketching, and precise navigation. It's particularly useful for users who frequently handwrite notes or prefer a more tactile input method. However, if you rarely use a stylus, it might not be a significant benefit.
