The Android tablet market is heating up, and two contenders are vying for your attention: the ZTE Axon Pad and the OnePlus Pad. Both offer premium features and powerful performance, but which one truly delivers the best experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Axon Pad edges out the OnePlus Pad with its slightly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and quicker 80W charging. However, the OnePlus Pad boasts a superior display and a more polished software experience, making it a strong contender. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | N/A |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 12 | 2023, February 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 279 x 181 x 6.5 mm (10.98 x 7.13 x 0.26 in) | 258 x 189.4 x 6.5 mm (10.16 x 7.46 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 605 g (1.33 lb) | 552 g (1.22 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) | 2000 x 2800 pixels (~296 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.1 inches, 424.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.61 inches, 411.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 144Hz, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, MyOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS (B1+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 67W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 10000 mAh | Li-Po 9510 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Halo Green |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1664:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-22.5 LUFS (Excellent)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 859019 (v9)
GeekBench: 3158 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Axon Pad
- Faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- 80W fast charging
- Potentially better for demanding games
- Larger RAM options (depending on configuration)
- Display not as impressive as OnePlus Pad
- Software experience may be less polished
- Battery life slightly shorter
OnePlus Pad
- Superior display quality (contrast, brightness)
- Clean and optimized OxygenOS software
- Slightly better battery life
- Premium design and build quality
- Slightly slower chipset than Axon Pad
- 67W charging is slower
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Pad takes the display crown. While the Axon Pad's display is respectable, the OnePlus Pad's 1664:1 contrast ratio and 442 nits brightness offer a noticeably more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Color accuracy and overall clarity are also superior on the OnePlus Pad.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is often an afterthought on tablets. Both devices feature decent, but not exceptional, camera setups. Expect similar performance in most scenarios. Neither is a standout in this category.
Performance
The ZTE Axon Pad holds a slight advantage in performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. While the Dimensity 9000 in the OnePlus Pad is no slouch, the Snapdragon generally offers a bit more raw processing power, particularly in demanding games. Both tablets handle everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Pad has a slightly larger battery capacity (8840 mAh vs Axon Pad's 7100 mAh). Coupled with the slightly less power-hungry chipset, it generally offers slightly better battery life. The ZTE Axon Pad's 80W charging is significantly faster, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Axon Pad is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, particularly gamers and those who frequently multitask. The OnePlus Pad is a better fit for those who value a stunning display, a clean and optimized software experience, and a more balanced overall package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which tablet is better for gaming?
The ZTE Axon Pad's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset gives it a slight edge for demanding games, although the OnePlus Pad is still capable of handling most titles well.
❓ Is the OnePlus Pad worth the extra cost?
If you prioritize display quality and a smooth software experience, the OnePlus Pad is likely worth the investment. If raw performance is your top priority, the ZTE Axon Pad might offer better value.
