ZTE Axon 60 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smoother experience and significantly faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset and 68W charging capability offer a noticeable advantage over the ZTE Axon 60's Unisoc Tiger T616 and 22.5W charging, despite the Axon 60's potentially lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 60 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 07 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 77.2 x 8.2 mm (6.55 x 3.04 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black, Purple | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | Z2356 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
ZTE Axon 60
- Potentially lower price point
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- May offer longer battery life due to potentially larger capacity (unconfirmed)
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less powerful processor
- Likely inferior display brightness and color accuracy
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster and more efficient processor
- Significantly faster charging (68W)
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Higher price point
- Battery life, while good, may not be dramatically longer than Axon 60
- May require more frequent charging with heavy use
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the ZTE Axon 60, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower given its chipset and price point. While both likely utilize LCD or OLED panels (data unavailable for Axon 60), the Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness translates to a more usable experience in direct sunlight. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price bracket, but the Edge 40 Neo’s color accuracy is likely superior due to its more advanced display calibration.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited data on the ZTE Axon 60. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is expected to offer a more consistent and refined camera experience. While both likely feature multi-camera setups, the Edge 40 Neo benefits from MediaTek’s image signal processor (ISP) and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Axon 60’s camera performance will likely be adequate for casual photography, but the Edge 40 Neo should excel in low-light conditions and offer more detailed images and videos. We'd expect the Edge 40 Neo to have better video stabilization as well.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a substantial performance uplift over the ZTE Axon 60’s 12nm Unisoc Tiger T616. The Dimensity 7030’s Cortex-A78 cores (2x2.5 GHz) are architecturally superior to the Axon 60’s Cortex-A75 cores (2x2.0 GHz), resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The 6nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature 6x Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Dimensity 7030’s overall system-on-chip (SoC) integration provides a more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery and charging department. While the exact battery capacity isn't specified, its 10:28h active use score demonstrates excellent endurance. Crucially, the 68W wired charging capability allows for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes – a massive advantage over the ZTE Axon 60’s slow 22.5W charging. This means less downtime and more time using the phone. The Axon 60 will likely require significantly longer to fully charge, even if it has a slightly larger battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Axon 60 if your primary concern is minimizing upfront cost and you're comfortable with a more basic user experience. It's a solid option for essential smartphone tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value faster performance for multitasking and gaming, a brighter display, and the convenience of rapid charging – even if it means spending a bit more.