ZTE Axon 60 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and software experience, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the stronger choice. However, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra offers comparable performance at a potentially lower price, making it ideal for power users and gamers who value raw speed and don't mind a less refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 60 Ultra | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 11 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 25 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 9.1 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | - | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | About 780 EUR | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers raw performance
- Software experience may be less refined
- Camera performance likely trails the Pixel 8 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera with Google’s computational photography
- Long-term software support and updates
- Seamless software experience with AI integration
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Tensor G3 may throttle under sustained load
- Generally higher price
Display Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a peak brightness of 1600 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Axon 60 Ultra’s display specs aren’t provided, ZTE typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Pixel 8 Pro’s LTPO technology allows for a variable refresh rate, optimizing battery life. The Pixel 8 Pro’s display is likely to have superior color accuracy and calibration due to Google’s focus on display quality, though the Axon 60 Ultra may offer a higher refresh rate depending on its panel.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s AI algorithms to produce stunning images. While the Axon 60 Ultra’s camera specs are not detailed, its market positioning suggests a focus on high megapixel counts. The Pixel 8 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Tensor G3’s dedicated image signal processor (ISP) enables features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are also likely superior, with advanced stabilization and cinematic modes. Without specific details on the Axon 60 Ultra’s sensor sizes and apertures, it’s difficult to directly compare image quality, but the Pixel 8 Pro’s software advantage is substantial.
Performance
Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but the architectures differ significantly. The Axon 60 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 features an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-X3 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, promising strong single-core performance. The Pixel 8 Pro’s Tensor G3 employs a nona-core setup with a 3.0 GHz Cortex-X3. While the Tensor G3 prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 generally excels in sustained CPU and GPU performance. The Axon 60 Ultra is likely to maintain higher frame rates in graphically intensive games due to the Snapdragon’s Adreno GPU. The Pixel 8 Pro’s Tensor G3 benefits from tight software integration, but may exhibit thermal throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Pixel 8 Pro achieves an impressive 11:14h active use score, indicating excellent battery life. Its 30W wired charging, while slower than the Axon 60 Ultra’s 80W, still offers a 50% charge in 30 minutes. The Pixel 8 Pro also supports 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. The Axon 60 Ultra’s 80W wired charging will significantly reduce charging times, potentially achieving a full charge in under 40 minutes. However, without knowing the Axon 60 Ultra’s battery capacity, it’s difficult to assess its overall endurance. The Pixel 8 Pro’s endurance rating of 90h suggests a larger battery capacity and optimized power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding tasks, and prioritize value for money. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a raw power advantage. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional camera capabilities with Google’s computational photography, and long-term software support with guaranteed updates.