ZTE Axon 60 Ultra vs. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max: A Deep Dive Comparison

The smartphone landscape is currently defined by two distinct philosophies: Apple’s tightly integrated ecosystem and the Android world’s focus on hardware innovation. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, challenges Apple’s iPhone 15 Pro Max, powered by the new A17 Pro, offering a compelling alternative for users seeking top-tier specs without the premium Apple price tag. This comparison dissects the key differences between these two flagship devices.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing a seamless ecosystem and long-term software support, the iPhone 15 Pro Max remains the superior choice. However, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra delivers comparable performance and a potentially more versatile camera system at a significantly lower price point, making it a strong contender for Android enthusiasts.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Axon 60 Ultra Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53, 66 - A3106
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A3106
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, April 112023, September 12
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, July 25Available. Released 2023, September 22
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, glass backGlass front, glass back, titanium frame (grade 5)
Dimensions163.6 x 76 x 9.1 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.36 in)159.9 x 76.7 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time; International)· eSIM + eSIM (8 or more, max 2 at a time; USA)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China)
Weight-221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
Protection-Ceramic Shield glass
Resolution1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)1290 x 2796 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120HzLTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Hexa-core (2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)Apple A17 Pro (3 nm)
GPUAdreno 740Apple GPU (6-core graphics)
OSAndroid 14iOS 17, upgradable to iOS 26.1
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 1TB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama)
Triple50 MP, (wide), PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro)48 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.8, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3D sensor‑shift OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth)
VideoYes4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, 3D (spatial) video, stereo sound rec.
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, Dolby Vision HDR
Single32 MP, (wide)12 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)
Video1080p@30fps4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, hotspot
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFace ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD3.0, QC4Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (MagSafe) 15W wireless (Qi2) - requires iOS 17.2 update 4.5W reverse wired
Type6000 mAhLi-Ion 4441 mAh
Misc
ColorsObsidian BlackBlack Titanium, White Titanium, Blue Titanium, Natural Titanium
Models-A2849, A3105, A3106, A3108, iPhone16,2
PriceAbout 780 EUR€ 758.79 / $ 579.87 / £ 628.29
SAR-1.07 W/kg (head)     1.11 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.98 W/kg (head)     0.98 W/kg (body)

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

  • Significantly faster 80W wired charging
  • Potentially more affordable price point
  • Android OS offers greater customization

  • Software update support may be limited
  • Ecosystem integration is less seamless than Apple

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

  • Exceptional performance with the A17 Pro chip
  • Long-term software support and updates
  • Superior ecosystem integration with other Apple devices

  • Slower charging speeds compared to the Axon 60 Ultra
  • Higher price tag

Display Comparison

The iPhone 15 Pro Max boasts a peak brightness of 1787 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Axon 60 Ultra’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s likely lower, though still respectable. Apple’s use of a ProMotion display (LTPO) allows for adaptive refresh rates up to 120Hz, optimizing battery life and smoothness. The iPhone’s display technology is a key differentiator, offering a more refined visual experience, while the Axon 60 Ultra likely focuses on maximizing screen real estate and color vibrancy.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs for the Axon 60 Ultra, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the iPhone 15 Pro Max’s camera system is renowned for its computational photography and video capabilities. Apple’s image processing prioritizes natural-looking images with excellent dynamic range. The Axon 60 Ultra, given ZTE’s history, may lean towards more saturated colors and aggressive sharpening. The iPhone’s ProRes video recording capabilities are a significant advantage for professional videographers. The absence of specific sensor details for the Axon 60 Ultra makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the iPhone.

Performance

The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. Apple’s A17 Pro, fabricated on a 3nm process, offers a hexa-core CPU configuration with two high-performance cores clocked at 3.78 GHz. This contrasts with the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), an octa-core processor. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a powerhouse, the A17 Pro’s architectural advantages and smaller node size likely translate to superior single-core performance and efficiency. The iPhone 15 Pro Max benefits from Apple’s tight control over hardware and software, optimizing performance for real-world tasks. The Axon 60 Ultra, however, offers a competitive experience, particularly in multi-threaded workloads.

Battery Life

The iPhone 15 Pro Max achieves an impressive 16:01h active use score, demonstrating excellent battery life. While the Axon 60 Ultra’s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W wired charging significantly outpaces the iPhone’s slower charging speeds (50% in 30 minutes). The iPhone 15 Pro Max supports 15W wireless charging via MagSafe and Qi2 (requiring iOS 17.2), while the Axon 60 Ultra’s wireless charging capabilities are not specified. The Axon 60 Ultra’s faster charging is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra if you need maximum hardware for your dollar, prioritize fast charging speeds (80W), and prefer the flexibility of the Android operating system. Buy the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max if you value a polished user experience, guaranteed software updates for years to come, and tight integration with other Apple devices, even if it means paying a premium.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Axon 60 Ultra throttle under sustained load, like during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a thermally efficient chip, but throttling can occur in any smartphone under prolonged heavy use. The Axon 60 Ultra’s cooling solution will determine the extent of throttling. While it won't match the A17 Pro's sustained performance, it should provide a smooth gaming experience for most users.
❓ How does the iPhone 15 Pro Max’s 15W wireless charging compare to the Axon 60 Ultra’s wireless charging (if specs were available)?
The iPhone 15 Pro Max’s 15W wireless charging is relatively slow compared to many Android phones. The Axon 60 Ultra, if it supports faster wireless charging, would offer a more convenient charging experience for users who prefer wireless power.
❓ Is the difference between the A17 Pro and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For typical daily usage, the difference between the A17 Pro and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 will be minimal. Both chips are powerful enough to handle everyday tasks with ease. The A17 Pro’s advantage becomes more apparent in demanding applications like video editing and high-end gaming.