ZTE Axon 50 Ultra vs vivo X90 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X90 Pro+ edges out the Axon 50 Ultra thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, enhanced camera system (particularly zoom capabilities), and faster wireless charging. However, the Axon 50 Ultra remains a compelling choice for those prioritizing value and a clean software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 50 Ultra | vivo X90 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 12 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 73.1 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| BDS Satellite Message (Emergency SOS service) | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Red |
| Models | - | V2227A |
| Price | - | About 1030 EUR |
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Excellent value for money
- Clean Android experience
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Fast 80W wired charging
- Camera not as advanced as competitors
- No wireless charging
- Less established brand reputation
vivo X90 Pro+
- Top-tier Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Exceptional camera system with advanced zoom
- Fast 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Reverse wired charging
- Premium build quality
- Higher price point
- vivo's software can be polarizing
- Availability may be limited in some regions
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with high refresh rates (likely 120Hz). The X90 Pro+ likely has slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to vivo's display tuning expertise. Expect vibrant colors and smooth scrolling on both devices, but the X90 Pro+ might offer a marginally superior visual experience.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X90 Pro+ is the clear winner in the camera department. It features a more advanced camera system, likely including a larger sensor and improved zoom capabilities. Expect better low-light performance, more detailed photos, and greater versatility. The Axon 50 Ultra's camera is still good, but it doesn't match the X90 Pro+'s overall capabilities.
Performance
The vivo X90 Pro+ boasts the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Axon 50 Ultra. This translates to faster processing speeds, improved efficiency, and better graphics performance. While the Axon 50 Ultra is still very capable, the X90 Pro+ will handle demanding tasks and games with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 80W wired charging, promising relatively fast charging times. The X90 Pro+ also includes 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, providing added convenience. Battery capacity is likely similar, but the X90 Pro+'s more efficient chipset could result in slightly better battery life.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is ideal for users seeking a high-performance flagship experience without breaking the bank. It's a great option for those who value a clean Android experience and don't need the absolute best camera features. The vivo X90 Pro+ is for photography enthusiasts and power users who demand top-tier performance, a versatile camera system, and premium features like wireless charging and reverse wired charging.