ZTE Axon 50 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7 Pro emerges as the better all-rounder. Its superior software integration, refined camera processing, and consistent performance outweigh the Axon 50 Ultra’s faster charging and raw processing power. However, gamers and power users prioritizing speed will find the Axon 50 Ultra a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 50 Ultra | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 12 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 73.1 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| BDS Satellite Message (Emergency SOS service) | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | - | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | - | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially superior gaming performance due to Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Competitive price point for the hardware offered
- Software experience likely less refined than Pixel 7 Pro
- Camera performance details are unknown, potentially lagging behind Pixel
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality powered by Google’s AI
- Seamless software experience with guaranteed updates
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging capabilities
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Tensor G2 may not match Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in raw processing power
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Axon 50 Ultra’s display specs aren’t provided, its market positioning suggests it likely doesn’t reach the same peak brightness. Both support PD3.0, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a superior OLED panel with deeper blacks. The Pixel 7 Pro’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts refresh rates for improved efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Axon 50 Ultra.
Camera Comparison
Both phones excel in photography and videography, but approach it differently. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s computational photography prowess, delivering consistently excellent results with minimal effort. The Axon 50 Ultra’s camera specs are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but its market positioning suggests a focus on hardware capabilities. The Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance, while the Axon 50 Ultra may offer more flexibility for manual control. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Axon 50 Ultra makes a definitive judgment difficult, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s software advantage is significant.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), known for its raw processing power and gaming capabilities. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, promises strong single-core performance. Conversely, the Google Pixel 7 Pro is powered by the Google Tensor G2 (5nm). While the Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 cores are clocked slightly higher at 2.85 GHz, the 5nm process and Google’s focus on AI and machine learning give it an edge in tasks like image processing and voice recognition. The Snapdragon’s 4nm node offers better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Pixel 7 Pro’s performance is optimized for Google’s software, while the Axon 50 Ultra prioritizes brute force.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing approaches. The Pixel 7 Pro offers 23W wired charging, reaching 50% in 30 minutes, alongside 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging. The Axon 50 Ultra significantly outpaces this with 80W wired charging, promising a much faster full charge. While the Pixel 7 Pro’s wireless charging is a convenience, the Axon 50 Ultra’s charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra if you need maximum performance for gaming and demanding tasks, prioritize incredibly fast 80W charging, and are comfortable with a less polished software experience. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience with guaranteed updates, exceptional camera capabilities powered by Google’s AI, and a more refined overall user experience.