ZTE Axon 40 Ultra vs. Axon 50 Ultra: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra edges out the 40 Ultra thanks to its upgraded Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, faster 80W charging, and generally improved performance. While the 40 Ultra boasts exceptional battery life, the 50 Ultra's enhancements make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | ZTE Axon 50 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 09 | 2023, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 13 | Cancelled |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 161.8 x 73.1 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~92.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MyOS 13 | Android 12, MyOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 91mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 64 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.7", PDAF | 64 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | BDS Satellite Message (Emergency SOS service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Silver | Black |
| Models | A2023P, A2023PG | - |
| Price | About 380 EUR | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 104h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) | - |
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (104h endurance)
- Competitive price
- Good display brightness (680 nits)
- Capable camera system
- Older Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Slower charging (65W)
- Potential for throttling under heavy load
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Improved Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Faster 80W charging
- Potentially better camera processing
- More modern design (likely)
- Higher price
- Likely shorter battery life than Axon 40 Ultra
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays, likely with similar resolutions (likely FHD+). The Axon 50 Ultra *may* have slightly improved color accuracy or brightness due to newer panel technology, but the 40 Ultra's 680 nits is already quite respectable. Expect smooth scrolling thanks to high refresh rates (likely 120Hz) on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to have capable camera systems, likely featuring a primary 108MP sensor. The Axon 50 Ultra *may* have improved image processing algorithms and potentially slightly better low-light performance due to the newer chipset. Video recording capabilities should be comparable, supporting 8K recording on both.
Performance
This is where the Axon 50 Ultra shines. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a significant upgrade over the 8 Gen 1 in the 40 Ultra, offering improved CPU and GPU performance, better efficiency, and reduced throttling under sustained load. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother gaming, and overall snappier responsiveness on the 50 Ultra.
Battery Life
The Axon 40 Ultra holds a clear advantage here. Its endurance rating of 104h is exceptional, suggesting significantly longer battery life than the Axon 50 Ultra. However, the Axon 50 Ultra compensates with 80W wired charging, allowing for much faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra? Users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a slightly more affordable price point. Who should buy the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra? Those seeking the best possible performance, faster charging, and a more modern chipset, even at a slightly higher cost.