ZTE Axon 40 Ultra vs. Axon 30 Ultra 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Axon 40 Ultra edges out the Axon 30 Ultra 5G thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, slightly better battery endurance, and generally improved performance. While both offer excellent value, the 40 Ultra represents a noticeable upgrade, especially for those prioritizing speed and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | CDMA 800 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 09 | 2021, April 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 13 | Available. Released 2021, April 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 161.5 x 73 x 8 mm (6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~92.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MyOS 13 | Android 11, MyOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 18GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/1.9, 35mm (standard), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 123mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 64 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 91mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 64 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.7", PDAF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Silver | Black, White, Blue, Light Brown, Aerospace Edition |
| Models | A2023P, A2023PG | A2022P, A2022PG |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 104h | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 703270 (v8) GeekBench: 3582 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Longer Battery Life (104h Endurance)
- Potentially Improved Camera Processing
- Modern Design
- May be slightly more expensive than Axon 30 Ultra
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can experience thermal throttling under sustained load
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G
- Excellent Value for Money
- Vibrant AMOLED Display
- Fast 65W Charging
- Good Camera System
- Slightly Older Processor (Snapdragon 888)
- Shorter Battery Life (91h Endurance)
- Potentially Less Refined Camera Processing
Display Comparison
Both phones boast vibrant AMOLED displays, but the Axon 40 Ultra measures a slightly brighter 680 nits compared to the Axon 30 Ultra's 698 nits. While the Axon 30 Ultra advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a nominal marketing term), both displays offer excellent color accuracy and viewing angles. The Axon 40 Ultra may have a slightly more modern display panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature impressive camera systems, but the Axon 40 Ultra likely has refinements in image processing. While detailed camera comparisons require extensive testing, the Axon 40 Ultra's newer chipset and potentially updated software should result in slightly better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Both offer versatile camera setups with multiple lenses.
Performance
The Axon 40 Ultra's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) provides a significant performance boost over the Axon 30 Ultra's Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm). The 8 Gen 1 offers improved CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming experiences. The Axon 40 Ultra's newer architecture also contributes to improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Axon 40 Ultra demonstrates superior battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 104 hours compared to the Axon 30 Ultra 5G's 91 hours. This difference translates to noticeably longer usage times between charges, making the Axon 40 Ultra a more reliable choice for heavy users.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is ideal for users who demand flagship-level performance without the flagship price tag, particularly gamers and those who frequently multitask. The Axon 30 Ultra 5G remains a solid choice for budget-conscious buyers who still want a premium experience with a great camera and fast charging, offering excellent value for its price point.