ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition vs nubia Z50 Ultra: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The nubia Z50 Ultra takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and improved camera system. While the Axon 40 Ultra offers a unique design and competitive price, the Z50 Ultra's performance and camera capabilities make it the superior choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | ZTE nubia Z50 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 29 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2023, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 163.9 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 228 g (8.04 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~92.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 13, MyOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 18GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Ring-LED, dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 91mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 64 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.7", PDAF | 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 50 MP, f/2.X, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE Audio, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1+L2+L5), GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Silver, Starry Sky |
| Models | A2023P | NX712J |
| Price | About 800 EUR | About 540 EUR |
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Unique under-display camera design
- Competitive price point
- 108MP main camera
- 80W fast charging
- Older Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially less impressive camera performance compared to Z50 Ultra
- Design may not appeal to everyone
ZTE nubia Z50 Ultra
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Superior camera system
- Potentially brighter and more accurate display
- Improved battery efficiency
- Likely higher price point
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature stunning AMOLED displays with high refresh rates (likely 120Hz). The nubia Z50 Ultra is expected to have a slightly brighter display and potentially a more accurate color calibration, though detailed specifications are needed for confirmation. The Axon 40 Ultra's under-display camera is a unique selling point, potentially offering a less intrusive front-facing experience, though image quality may be slightly compromised.
Camera Comparison
The nubia Z50 Ultra is expected to have a more advanced camera system, likely featuring a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing capabilities. While the Axon 40 Ultra boasts a 108MP main sensor, the Z50 Ultra's hardware and software optimizations are likely to result in superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Both phones likely offer excellent video recording capabilities.
Performance
The nubia Z50 Ultra's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a substantial performance advantage over the Axon 40 Ultra's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly improved gaming performance on the Z50 Ultra. The Gen 2's efficiency also translates to better battery life under load.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 80W wired charging, promising relatively fast charging times. However, the nubia Z50 Ultra's more efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset should contribute to better overall battery life, allowing it to last longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a good choice for users prioritizing a unique design and a slightly more budget-friendly flagship experience. The nubia Z50 Ultra is ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance and camera quality.