ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition vs. Axon 50 Ultra: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Axon 50 Ultra edges out the 40 Ultra thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, offering noticeably better performance and efficiency. While both offer excellent features, the 50 Ultra's improved processor makes it the superior choice for most users, especially those prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | ZTE Axon 50 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 29 | 2023, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Cancelled |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 161.8 x 73.1 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~92.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12, MyOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 18GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 91mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 64 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.7", PDAF | 64 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | BDS Satellite Message (Emergency SOS service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | A2023P | - |
| Price | About 800 EUR | - |
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Unique under-display selfie camera
- Flagship specs at a competitive price
- Fast 80W charging
- Attractive design
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can throttle under sustained load
- Slightly older chipset compared to the 50 Ultra
- Potential for software update delays
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Improved power efficiency
- Likely better image processing
- Slightly more modern design
- Potentially higher price
- Under-display selfie camera may not be as good as a traditional one
- Software update delays possible
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The Axon 50 Ultra might have slightly improved brightness and color accuracy due to potential display panel refinements, but the difference is likely minimal for most users. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones boast impressive camera setups, likely featuring a 108MP main sensor. The Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is known for its under-display selfie camera, a unique feature. The Axon 50 Ultra likely has improved image processing algorithms thanks to its newer chipset, resulting in slightly better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Expect similar video recording capabilities on both.
Performance
This is where the Axon 50 Ultra shines. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the 40 Ultra. Expect faster app loading times, smoother gaming performance, and better overall responsiveness. The 8+ Gen 1 also boasts improved power efficiency, leading to potentially longer battery life.
Battery Life
Both devices have an 80W wired charging capability, promising fast charging times. However, the more efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Axon 50 Ultra could translate to slightly better real-world battery life, even with the same battery capacity (likely around 4500mAh on both).
Buying Guide
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who still want a flagship-level experience. It's ideal for those who prioritize a unique design and a good camera system. The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is best suited for users who demand top-tier performance, smoother multitasking, and a more efficient processor, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.