ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition vs. Axon 40 Pro: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition boasts a significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and faster charging, making it the performance champion. However, the Axon 40 Pro offers a more balanced package with a slightly more efficient processor and potentially better value for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | ZTE Axon 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - ROW | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 29 | 2022, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 72.9 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.87 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~92.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12, MyOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 18GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 91mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 64 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.7", PDAF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 65W wired, PD, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Dream black, Crystal blue, Gold |
| Models | A2023P | A2023G, A2023 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | About 410 EUR |
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Significantly faster performance
- 80W fast charging
- Potentially better camera quality
- Premium 'Space Edition' design
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Higher price
- Slightly shorter battery life under heavy load
ZTE Axon 40 Pro
- Excellent value for money
- Efficient Snapdragon 870 processor
- Good camera performance
- Reliable battery life
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful than the Ultra Space Edition
- Potentially less premium design
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The Ultra Space Edition may have slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to its 'Space Edition' branding and potential calibration, but the difference is likely minimal for most users. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a triple-camera system. The Ultra Space Edition likely has a higher resolution main sensor (potentially 108MP) and improved image processing capabilities, resulting in sharper and more detailed photos, especially in low light. The Pro's camera is still very capable, offering good image quality and versatile shooting options. Expect similar ultrawide and macro lenses on both.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Ultra Space Edition is undeniably faster than the Snapdragon 870 in the Pro. Expect noticeably quicker app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games. However, the 8 Gen 1 is known to run hotter, potentially impacting sustained performance. The 870 is more efficient and provides excellent performance for everyday tasks and most games.
Battery Life
The Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition's 80W charging is significantly faster than the Pro's 65W. Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 4500-5000mAh), but the 8 Gen 1's higher power consumption might result in slightly shorter battery life under heavy use compared to the more efficient 870.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is ideal for power users, gamers, and anyone who prioritizes raw performance and fast charging. The ZTE Axon 40 Pro is a great choice for those seeking a well-rounded smartphone experience with a strong camera and good battery life without breaking the bank.