ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition vs Huawei P50 Pro: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Axon 40 Ultra boasts a more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and faster charging. However, the P50 Pro shines with its exceptional camera system and impressive battery life. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: performance and speed versus photography and endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | Huawei P50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 29 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) | 158.8 x 72.8 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1228 x 2700 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~92.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Kirin 9000 (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G78 MP24Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | HarmonyOS 2.0 (China), EMUI 14.2 (Europe), no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 18GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom, 7x lossless zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF 40 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (B/W), AF |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 91mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 64 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.7", PDAF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless charging |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4360 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Golden Black, Cocoa Gold, Pearl White, Charm Pink |
| Models | A2023P | JAD-AL50, JAD-LX9, JAD-AL00 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | $ 196.62 / £ 329.00 / € 473.13 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 76h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 793876 (v8), 786215 (v9) GeekBench: 3145 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- 80W Fast Charging
- Sleek Design
- High Refresh Rate Display (likely)
- Camera not as strong as P50 Pro
- Software support potentially limited
- Battery life not as impressive
Huawei P50 Pro
- Exceptional Camera System
- Long Battery Life (76h endurance)
- Premium Design
- Wireless Charging (50W) & Reverse Wireless Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Potential Software Limitations (Huawei ecosystem)
- Slower Wired Charging (66W)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays. The P50 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 754 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, suggesting vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Axon 40 Ultra likely has a similarly high-quality AMOLED display, though specific brightness figures are harder to find. The P50 Pro's display arguably has a slight edge in contrast.
Camera Comparison
The Huawei P50 Pro is renowned for its exceptional camera system, particularly its image processing capabilities. While the Axon 40 Ultra has a capable camera setup, the P50 Pro consistently delivers stunning photos and videos. The P50 Pro's computational photography is a major strength.
Performance
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers a significant performance advantage over the P50 Pro's Kirin 9000/Snapdragon 888 4G combination. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Axon 40 Ultra. The Kirin chipset, while capable, is not as competitive in today's market.
Battery Life
The Huawei P50 Pro takes the lead in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 76 hours. The Axon 40 Ultra's battery capacity is likely smaller, and while its 80W charging is faster, it won't compensate for the P50 Pro's superior endurance.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is ideal for users who prioritize raw performance, gaming, and fast charging. The Huawei P50 Pro is a better choice for photography enthusiasts and those who value long battery life and a refined user experience, despite potential software limitations.