Looking for an affordable ZTE smartphone? The Axon 40 SE and Blade A52 Lite are both contenders, but they cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which one is the right fit for your budget and usage.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Axon 40 SE offers a significantly more powerful chipset and faster charging, making it the clear winner for performance-focused users. The Blade A52 Lite is likely the more budget-friendly option, prioritizing affordability over raw power, and may be suitable for basic tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 28, 66 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 20 | 2022, August 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 25 | Available. Released 2022, August |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.8 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 164.8 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core |
| Chipset | Unisoc UMS512T T618 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | - |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Yes |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Gray, Green |
| Models | 9047 | - |
| Price | About 300 EUR | - |
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- More powerful chipset
- Faster charging (22.5W)
- Likely better camera system
- Larger display (typically)
- Potentially higher price
- Unisoc chipset not as well-regarded as Snapdragon/MediaTek
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- More affordable
- Decent battery life (likely)
- Lightweight and compact (potentially)
- Weaker performance
- Slower charging
- Basic camera system
- Limited features
Display Comparison
While specific display details for the Blade A52 Lite are scarce, the Axon 40 SE typically features a 6.6-inch IPS LCD display with a 1080 x 2400 resolution. Expect decent color accuracy and viewing angles on the Axon 40 SE, while the Blade A52 Lite likely has a more basic display with potentially lower resolution and brightness.
Camera Comparison
The Axon 40 SE generally boasts a more capable camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor and additional lenses. The Blade A52 Lite's camera is likely more basic, prioritizing simplicity over advanced features. Image quality and low-light performance will likely be better on the Axon 40 SE.
Performance
The Axon 40 SE's Unisoc UMS512T T618 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Blade A52 Lite's unspecified octa-core CPU. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better overall responsiveness on the Axon 40 SE. The Blade A52 Lite will likely struggle with more demanding apps and games.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a battery capacity around 5000mAh. However, the Axon 40 SE's 22.5W fast charging offers a significant advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups compared to the Blade A52 Lite's likely slower charging speeds.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Axon 40 SE is ideal for users who want a smoother experience for everyday tasks, light gaming, and appreciate faster charging. The ZTE Blade A52 Lite is a good choice for those on a very tight budget who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and basic app usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Unisoc T618 and the CPU in the Blade A52 Lite?
The Unisoc T618 in the Axon 40 SE is a more powerful chipset, offering better performance for gaming and multitasking compared to the likely less powerful CPU in the Blade A52 Lite.
❓ Is the ZTE Blade A52 Lite worth buying if I only need a basic phone?
Yes, if your primary needs are calls, texts, and basic app usage, and you're on a very tight budget, the Blade A52 Lite can be a suitable option.
